Teacher Brianne Dressen recounts her horrifying and ongoing vaccine ordeal—and the coverup of adverse reactions by health officials, mainstream media, and the New England Journal of Medicine
These people need to be brought to justice. It won't be enough for the shots to be stopped. These actions are criminal and everyone at the FDA, NIH, CDC, and the pharma companies who has been complicit needs to be tried and jailed.
You are a psychic. Crimes against humanity complaint filed in Texas and the list of defendants includes FDA, NIH, CDC, Murderna, Schizer, CastraZenica, etc...
Please renew your jab subscription on a quarterly basis to avoid dealing with the upcoming variant which will be 30% more dangerous than the prevailing one.
When I look at the concerns and censorship of these vaccines, I think about how none of my doctors and few people know about the millions of DES (Diethylstilbestrol (DES) babies who were doused in this extremely strong estrogen every day when they were a fetus. WE, the DES babies have been forgotten. DES is a synthetic form of the female hormone estrogen. It was prescribed to pregnant women between 1940 and 1971 to prevent miscarriage, premature labor, and related complications of pregnancy) babies. However, the drug companies knew it didn't prevent miscarriages, that it was a carcinogen and that in animals the impact of having been exposed to this drug lasted down 7 generations. Most of those male and female babies exposed to this disastrous drug don't even know it because it was put in vitamins and that's all their mothers knew. My mom was a nurse, so when the rare cancers started appearing in young women who were DES babies, she knew to tell me. It wasn't until over 20 years later after the moms took this drug that the rare cancers in women exposed to DES in the womb started. Interestingly, the CDC which supported so much of the DES research, removed it all from their website a few weeks after the election For most of us the impact has been on almost every aspect of our life. You can go to the DES Action website which describes it all. https://desaction.org If you have had several of the following concerns, talk to your doctor and investigate the DES website. Everyone knows about Tuskegee Airmen and the experimental drugs they were given, but so few know about DES. WHY? Research indicates that DES caused the following problems, but different individuals had different combinations of these problems: 1. You were described as a baby who was always sick (immune system weakened.) 2. Your mother had breast cancer indicative of too much estrogen when she was pregnant with you..
3. Your period came early (mine was in 5th grade) 4. If you were a DES female, you often had two heavy periods in the same month.
5. If you were a DES male, you had Testicular cancer at a young age (possibly the DES grandsons also have a higher rate - little research, but my son had and I know 2 other DES women whose sons did.
6. Your daughter had a higher chance of starting her period late (my d. started in mid high school). There also is a higher probability of tibia torsion and other muscular skeletal changes in DES grandbabies. Little is known about the DES great grandbabies, but one researcher opined that muscular skeletal changes seemed more common.
7. As a female you were born with a T-shaped uterus and could not carry babies. 8. As a female you effaced a few months into your pregnancy. Some of these women also could not carry babies, but for some like me , suddenly the effacing stopped in time. 9. You had an ectopic pregnancy which are more common in DES daughters. 10. You had preeclampsia. 26.4% of DES Daughters dealing with preeclampsia during their pregnancies compared with 13.7% of unexposed.
11.You had Paraovarian Cysts which are more common in those exposed to DES. 12.You had adenosis. DES Daughters often have sections of the vagina lined with glandular cells most often found lining the uterus, fallopian tubes and cervix. When these glandular cells are located in the vagina, they are called adenosis. While this is completely normal tissue in the body, it is in the wrong place. 13.You have rheumatoid arthritis which is more common in DES individuals especially when it starts very early. 14. As a male were you born with a hypospadia 15. There is still a need for more research on sexuality differences in DES and non DES exposed individuals. One researcher reported that in his non-random group of DES sons, “Somewhere between one-quarter and one-third of members of the DES Sons’ network since 1999 have indicated that gender dysphoria, transsexual outcomes, and/or sexual health issues were among their top concerns. 16. For men: Cryptorchidism: DES has been associated with extremely small testes and/or undescended testes (cryptorchidism). Men born with undescended testicles (even if their mother was not given DES) have an increased risk for developing testicular cancer. When found early, testicular cancer can generally be cured. All men should practice testicular self-exam regularly. My son would have died if he hadn't done those regular checks. 17. Hypospadias is a condition where the urethral opening on the penis is in the wrong place, emerging somewhere down the shaft instead of at the tip. In many cases hypospadias can be corrected with surgery. A higher number of DES exposed males were born with these. 18. A French study by Michel Tournaire, MD, an OBGYN with the Hospital of Paris, and the DES France Association Network, showed six types of birth defects occurred more frequently among DES Grandchildren, in decreasing risk: esophagus defects; other digestive defects; male genital tract anomalies (especially undescended testicle(s) and hypospadias); cleft lip/palate; musculoskeletal anomalies; and congenital heart defects. The researchers did find a greater likelihood of cerebral palsy among DES Grandchildren that corresponded with a higher rate of preterm birth in the DES exposed group.
What do you suppose the chances are of success for these lawsuits? Heck, though. When they're all thrown out of court you can say the judges are all corrupt too. Geez. Is EVERYBODY corrupt?
Below is one of the 2 International Criminal Court cases that I am aware of. If US courts reject legitimate complaints, the ICC is already accepting them:
So the International Criminal Court is investigating the USA? What's it going to do if it finds us guilty? Thanks for the laugh.
BTW, is it also going to investigate Russia when it invades Ukraine. The first large-scale land war in Europe since WWII? Good God Russia is a backward country.
In paragraph 13, there is a typo. The condition is transverse myelitis, not traverse myelitis. I am speaking from personal experience as I was diagnosed with this potentially devastating condition some 20 years ago. I was fortunate enough to make an almost complete recovery. Hence, why I will NEVER subject myself to this horrific gene therapy.
I have better things to do than click your posts. For all I know, you are Russian. Why would any sane person trust some anonymous person on a comment thread when there are perfectly reliable sources of it from journalists and others who take ethical standards seriously.
Bobby, bobby are you msm spoonfed and brainwashed? Ha ha. It really surprises me at a constant how non critical thinkers get aggro because ignorance is their wise choice... ha, ha.
So you are one of those "critical thinkers." Well, I'm so glad to have you around. The rest of us probably wouldn't know what to do without your wise council.
I am not posting verifiable information online for trolls because I know what they're doing online is disinformation, misinformation and mass formation psychosis and are paid for it.
Thank you for this article Linda Bovie! Your journalism is another piece of this giant (crazy!) puzzle - one day, all of the pieces will be assembled & we will be able to see what-on-earth happened to us all. I appreciate your work as it helps connect people (like myself) who have questions, are looking for answers and want to hear voices other than than mainstream narrative. Keep up the good work!
The point I'd illustrate is how RARE Ms. Bonvie's journalism is. You simply cannot find pieces like this in the mainstream media. She references the press event hosted by Sen. Johnson. I found the invitation that the senator's staffers sent to all D.C. media when they held this event. Apparently, not one "corporate" news organization covered this event, or if any reporter did, he or she didn't file any story. All the stories I have seen (and videos) are from "alternative media" sources. There IS a "blackout" of "contrarian" COVID stories. This in itself is a scandalous story that someone needs to tell.
How exactly is it helpful to us to read about the experiences of a person in a clinical trial of a vaccine that is not even approved for use in the US? You would have to go to Britain to get it.
Yes, you certainly need to be wary of that mainstream. You know, the things most people believe, like the sky is blue and water is wet. Better be safe and stick to the alternative explanations.
Hi Bob, I actually do believe the sky is blue and that water is wet. In my post, I didn’t mention I was looking for alternative explanations - I was thanking Linda for writing this piece, as I appreciate hearing differing voices other than the mainstream narrative. I try to gather information from a variety of sources as this helps me understand what is going on. I’m not a scientist, nor do I pretend be one. Nor am I a conspiracy theorist. But I am a skeptic at heart and therefore want to explore all the various pieces of information available to me before I arrive at a conclusion - and that applies to almost any topic, not just science. Linda’s piece shares a woman’s story of her vaccine ordeal - the reactions she suffered, the lack of support from health officials and her attempt to get answers and share her experience with the general public. Am I “wary of that mainstream”? Perhaps that is your interpretation. I’d describe "that mainstream" as one part of the story - it may surprise you to hear that I follow mainstream news, but I’m always looking for more information and I’m glad that journalists like Linda are writing pieces such as this.
One question for you Bob - why do you think Brianne Dressen’s story isn’t covered by “that mainstream”?
Wow. I could take a guess why the "mainstream" didn't cover this particular case. (Maybe something about not wanting anything to do with senator nut
job's political stunts.) But first, it would really help to have an idea of what's mainstream and what is not. Nearly all big media is corporate. Single entities own multiple TV stations and newspapers, and even among the largest of them they do anything but speak in one voice. Nothing Tucker Carlson ever said or wrote would pass muster with the New York Times. So to suggest that there is some sort of deal between them to publish or suppress certain "news" is not very credible.
And this woman's story is just that. One woman's story. An anecdote, however unfortunate, and a one-sided view at that. It might be interesting to hear what her doctors have to say, in the interest of a fair and balanced view.
In any event, to focus on one story and ignore the big picture is the opposite of science. It may evoke your sympathy, but it doesn't teach us anything applicable to the broader society.
Here you go Bob. More documented cases of adverse effects from the vaccines. This is what real investigative journalism looks like, and you don't find this at Fox, the WSJ, NBC/CBS/ABC, NY Times or any MSM outlets.
After reading your comments, it is clear that you have bought into the narrative 100% and have no interest in hearing the other side. Your interest is likely more in line with wanting to suppress alternative views. An honest look at the data reveals that the vaccines are not nearly as effective or as safe as advertised, while the mainstream media and big pharma push a narrative that one of the safest drugs in history that has been used to treat a number of off-label conditions somehow turned dangerous because covid.
Compare the AE's reported from the vaccines since December 2020 to the AEs reported for all other vaccines combined since 1990 and explain to me why the AEs for these experimental gene therapies should not be explored more fully. Also explain how it is that VigiAccess reports roughly 5800 AEs for Ivermectin after by now over 4 billion people treated since 1992 - yet it is Ivermectin that is vilified by the media.
Your posts are largely snarky, substance free assertions. Others have provided data and analysis. As Thomas Sowell said, "It is usually futile to argue facts and analysis with people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance". That fits you to a T.
The following comment says don't waste your time with online trolls. I would say you appear to be wasting a lot of time looking for conspiratorial rabbit holes where you can find validation for what you already want to believe.
It is not my job to "research" these issues. I am not a scientist. That's their job. Most of the people who say they are doing research don't seem to have a clue what that really is. Or a very good grounding in science.
I'm curious: If you were in a car accident would you go to the internet to find a way to patch yourself up? Or would you go to an emergency room where there are people who know what to do?
As I stated earlier, those that refuse to question what is happening and claim to "follow the science" are the most scientifically illiterate people on the planet, and while not the exclusive domain of the left, it is predominately those on the left who blindly follow "the experts". Feynman had a couple of very good quotes - "I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned" and "Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts".
These are people paid by the global predators for disinformation.
If you're healthy today and are injected with 40trillion mRNA nano-particles and die tomorrow, they'll tell you that it's coincidence. But when that happens to millions of people around the world they still call that coincidence. They tell you that what you see as red is actually green - they are paid for mass formation psychosis and you should just ignore them.
Except that I find a number of replies to bob, including yours, to be informative. That bob simply posts snarky, substance and fact free assertions reveals a level of ignorance that is in a word breathtaking. I have yet to see a single post from little ol bob that backs up any of his assertions.
For those of you who are interested, this is what Russian disinformation looks like. And these people really are paid. At Russian wages, which are about to take a dive when Putin makes the most disastrous mistake of his career, but at least it's something.
Thank you for this article. Very insightful look into how the corrupt Narrative is being protected. I believe the headline, however, is erroneous - the million plus VAERS reports include a significant number of foreign reports. As of 1/7/2022, there were over a million VAERS reports, but 754,900 of those were "American" reports. See https://vaersanalysis.info/2022/01/14/vaers-summary-for-covid-19-vaccines-through-01-07-2022/.
So there are over one million VAERs reports, but so far less than one million "American" VAERS reports. To say "A Million Americans Were Injured by Covid Vaccines" based on the VAERS reports is therefore not entirely accurate. It overstates the number of domestic VAERS reports. But at the same time, it dramatically understates the number of vaccine injuries, as we all know VAERS is underreported. I don't have any suggestions for capturing that nuance in a headline.
Many people will not relate a medical problem to have been caused from the vaccine especially if older, and their Dr. told them it wasn’t related. I’ve heard that numerous times but since then have come to understand Drs. who most often are under a corporate thumb were advised to not say anything that would lead to people not wanting to get the vax. Most people tend to “believe” their Drs. not realizing medicine has changed over the years, and Drs. aren’t nearly as independent thinking as years ago when they had their own practices and medicine wasn’t quite so corrupt & controlled by big pharma.
Its a mess. Hopefully, there are some who will speak the truth. Go to one that is not under the thumb of a corporate entity but rather independent. Then they are more likely to still be independent thinking.
Easy. Any doctor who refuses to allow treatment using an FDA approved drug with an extraordinary safety profile proven over decades of use and with proven anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties is likely bought and paid for by big pharma. Claiming that an FDA approved drug has not been approved to treat any off-label condition is an example of dis-information in that it implies that drugs are never to be used in such a manner when in fact, roughly 20% of prescriptions written are for that purpose. That you swallow that kind of nonsense hook, line, and sinker is simply another tell to your level of ignorance.
Invermectin has "proven anti-viral properties?" Since when? And just because doctors sometimes prescribe things off-label is not a good argument for doing it in this case. The reason they refuse to prescribe it for Covid is because IT DOESN'T WORK.
Do you also get the stats from injuries and deaths from Covid? There are lots of dead people who wished they would have taken the "risk" of a vaccine injury.
I'm curious how many hours a day you spend obsessing about this. And there is nothing outdated about conspiracy theories. They have been around as long as there have been conspiracies. In fact, on a website like this, you might even say they have become "mainstream."
"the million plus VAERS reports include a significant number of foreign reports"
This is incorrect. Using the CDC Wonder search (which is connected to VAERS), the categories for US/Territories/Unknown (as it's primarily for Americans: other countries have their own surveillance), the total number was "1,473,687", and no, it wasn't skewered by 'unknown' which was a 'mere' "187,978".
In contrast, Foreign was 'only' "420,948" (it's counted separately from the above category, so it's 'on top of' and not 'exclusively to'). This is why we check the original VAERS database and not some third hand website.
I've uploaded the appropriate screenshots taken from the search:
The "corrupt narrative." "as we all know." Good God. There is speculation that conspiracy theories find fertile ground in people who feel powerless. Who feel their lives are somehow controlled and harmed by shadowy and nefarious actors. And now we are to believe that it's the government, the one that we elect, that's behind it all.
Of course that makes perfect sense if you think the government we have is not the one we elected. It appears that conspiracy theories are much like lies. One leads to another.
I'm very happy you know how to spell it. I would be even happier if you actually had the expertise to draw reasonable conclusions from millions of unverified raw statistics. But I suppose it's much simpler to be a play scientist than a real one.
What expertise to you have to statistically analyze the VAERS data or to even have an informed opinion about the statistical relevance of the VAERS data?
How many scientific publications have you read recently about the analysis of the VAERS data by scientists around the world?
How much do you get paid for spreading dissension on Western comment threads? How does your boss judge if you are doing and effective job at it? I'm just curious. In any event, what worked in 2016 will be a little harder to pull off now that we know you are among us. On some sites they have "spot the troll" contests.
All VAAERS is is raw, unfiltered data, that has not been examined or studied in any depth in such a short time. To use it to draw scientific conclusions would be malpractice if you were a real scientist.
Malpractice refers to many types of conduct and not just to doctors. And if a scientist misrepresents data or draws unwarranted conclusions from it, that qualifies as malpractice in my book.
There is nothing new about scientific malpractice, and it does not have to break the law. In fact the field of vaccine "science" seems to draw more than its fair share of quacks and people who manage to publish things in the major journals, which then have to retract them and apologize for being taken in.
Sadly, by that point in time may be millions will have been fooled. And I guess it must just be a human instinct to dig in rather than admit you have been played for a fool.
Thankfully, no-one shares your draconian views of censorship and secrecy simply because people disagree with you on conclusions on the data.
Further, there is no evidence to back up your claim it "does more harm than good", and sticking the speculative word "probably" won't save face either.
I would not presume to draw any conclusions from the data. There are experts who do those things and I trust them. There seems to be a very large deficit of trust on this website.
Nor am I. But my doctors are at a highly-regarded medical research university, and when I have questions I go there for answers. Not to the internet and certainly not to right-wing "news" sites that are clearly out to make a buck from people looking for validation of what they already want to believe.
If you don't go to the internet and "not to right-wing "news" sites" then why are you here?
Also, the 'profiteering' aspect has been debunked. The pharmaceutical companies made $34 billion last year, and yet you're griping over a few dollars? Hypocrisy much.
"a highly-regarded medical research university" ah yes, the University of Generic.
I'm here just out of curiosity and you will be happy to hear I won't be here for much longer. BTW, one of the biggest reasons big pharma makes so much money is because the GOP refuses to allow Medicare and Medicaid to negotiate drug prices. And they are by far the largest purchasers of prescription drugs. The GOP makes sure Americans pay the highest drug prices in the world.
And it's part of the University of California system if you must know.
I'm so sorry this happened to Brianne. What struck me as particularly interesting was the fact that many of her symptoms, although triggered by the vaccination, were remarkably similar to the symptoms I experienced more than five and a half years ago while fighting a severe viral infection. Subsequently, I was diagnosed with POTS (Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome), post viral syndrome, and post viral fatigue. I was told the illness was "self-limiting" and that I would "improve in time." I never did. I saw over 15 doctors in the year that followed and no one offered any treatment despite the fact I begged for anti-viral meds, anything to stop the progression of my illness and restore me to good health.
After many months with no improvement, I was officially diagnosed with ME (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis), also commonly called Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (I hate that term), a predominantly post viral illness with no known cure, numerous comorbid medical conditions, like POTS, and no FDA approved treatment. It's a horribly debilitating chronic illness that destroys the health and the lives of people unfortunate enough to develop it. It often follows a viral infection but can be triggered by vaccines, Lyme Disease, and many other "things." It's a disease three times as prevalent as Multiple Sclerosis (MS) but hardly any doctors, or people for that matter, are even aware of it or, in the case of doctors, know how to diagnose it using the 2015 IOM Clinician's Guide for ME/CFS.
The aforementioned "guide,' which was sponsored by the FDA, CDC, HHS, VA, and other govenrment agencies, has NEVER, to my knowledge, made it into the hands of ONE SINGLE DOCTOR in the US. I wonder why. I've had to provide copies of it to my doctors to educate them about my disease since ME is not taught in most medical schools. Some doctors even still mistakenly believe it's not a "real" disease despite over 6,000 scientific peer reviewed articles published about ME. Since I became ill, I've faced widespread bias from the medical profession because of my ME diagnosis many refusing to even acknowledge it.
Sadly, the number of people with ME is expected to grow due to the pandemic, Long Covid, and the vaccine injured like Brianne. ME experts predict about 50% of people with Long Covid will be diagnosed with ME since many already meet the diagnostic criteria for this disease after six months of continuous symptoms. It's unknown how many vaccine injured will develop ME but sadly it won't be an insignificant number.
I’m very sorry for how you’ve been treated, Lori. It’s unconscionable. I hope you do eventfully improve given even more time. Fibromyalgia is another condition I can think of where doctors dismiss people’s symptoms and often mistreat them emotionally. I used to work with a group of physicians who did this. So these patients would make their way to me, a nurse practitioner who was willing to listen, try new and alternative treatments, and confirm their suffering at the very least. At least they had a compassionate ear which all deserve.
The reality is that only about 2-3% of people diagnosed with ME ever recover. It's unlikely, given all my comorbidities that developed following the acute infection, that I will ever recover. I've accepted that several years ago and have moved on. However, given all the research on Long Covid, there may be some treatments in the very near future, that give me an improved quality of life. That would be nice indeed.
There is a non-trivial amount of evidence that serious viral and bacterial infections can lead to other diseases, particularly auto-immune disease. The exact connection is unknown to medical science, but there are numerous theories about it which are being investigated.
It's quite a leap though, to suggest that there is causation between vaccines and later disease. Long Covid is a direct result of the damage Covid does, to people's lungs, to their brains, their hearts and blood vessels, and other organs. Causation is clear. It's because they got Covid. I am not aware of any cases of long-Covid from vaccination. In fact, all the data we have now suggests that even if the vaccine has risks for some people, it clearly is far safer than getting Covid.
Or to put it a different way: If we had a database of people who got the vaccine and had no adverse events, the number would dwarf the VAERS database. Hundreds of millions to one. I'll take those odds any day.
The number is unknown but you know it will be significant. How exactly? Anecdotes? There has been plenty of reporting about long Covid. But according to this site, all of the information about vaccine injuries has been suppressed. All so big pharma can make a buck. Geez.
Yet one more substance free snarky comment. You have yet to provide any information to back up any assertion. As Linus correctly points out "Trust the science is the most anti-science statement ever. Questioning science is how you do science". Liberals have revealed themselves to be the most scientific illiterate people on the planet.
Question science is a perfectly reasonable thing to do. If you are a scientist. For a lay person to do it is an exercise in stupidity. Non-scientists have neither the knowledge nor the tools to do it. And conspiracy theories are a poor substitute. They lead to rational conclusions like believing Q-anon.
The exercise in stupidity is following the lead lemming over the cliff - exactly what fools like you are doing. It is clear that you have an inability to read or comprehend anything outside of your little bubble. You have made numerous erroneous comments that reveal your ignorance and have yet to post a single link to anything that backs up your assertions.
According to Dr. Jose Montoya, Infectious Disease Specialist and ME\CFS (ME) expert, "up to 11% of people who suffer a severe viral illness will develop a chronic, post viral illness like ME." Post viral illness has been seen with every pandemic around the world and, in the case of SARS, MERS, and Ebola, the numbers have even been higher, according to Dr. Ian Lipkin, the world reknown "virus hunter." Other ME\CFS specialists, like Dr. Lucinda Bateman of the Bateman Horne Center in SLC, Utah, and Dr. Walter Komaroff, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, agree. If you include the number of vaccine injured presenting with an ME like illness, the ME population can easily double. Right now, it's stands out about 2.5M in the US alone although we suspect that number is grossly underreported.
A segment of the worldwide ME population is vaccine hesitant since some have developed this horrible disease from a vaccine (e.g., the flu vaccine, hepatitis vaccine, HPV vaccine, etc). To make the situation even worse, the Covid vaccines have caused many in my ME community to suffer a crash, a severe exacerbation of symptoms, and some are still struggling to return to their baseline level of functioning after many months. This is not an acceptable vaccine outcome. Since so many of us are housebound or bedridden, and have little exposures, we've decided not to take the vaccine until and unless a safer one is developed for our patient population. Our government may not care about how we're being adversely affected by the vaccines but our community most certainly is and is tracking it. You can find out more about it on HealthRising.com. one of the best sites for information about ME which, by the way, was created by someone who has the disease and who has become a recognized expert on it, Cort Johnson.
Well, if you are housebound and have little interaction with other people then clearly the vaccine is not as important. But whatever the issue is, I will trust the experts to study it in a scientific way, and I will trust the consensus results. They may be wrong, but it's a lot more likely that some lonely voice in the wilderness is wrong. And I'm quite sure there are teams of experts in many places right now researching the issue of vaccine injuries and every other aspect of this disease. There has been reporting about vaccine injuries in mainstream publications for some time. And I do not believe conspiracy theories that suggest doctors or big pharma are trying to suppress the truth and intentionally injure people, for profit or not.
And one more comment. Yet another great article exposing what is clear corruption and possibly criminal behavior among a number of institutions involved in an unholy alliance. If the MSM was not fully bought and paid for by big pharma, as indicated in this article, this travesty would have been exposed a long time ago.
What would you say if I told you that that is a conspiracy theory, and that it's complete nonsense? There are tens of thousands of highly trained and intelligent people who work for both the mainstream media and the pharmaceutical companies. Do you mean to say they are all in on it? Not one has come forward to expose this massive fraud?
Dr Malone the inventor of mRNA technology has been deplattformed by all those social media on behalf of the Biden administration and there are hundreds of honest scientists around the world who have been shut up including Luc Montagnier the nobel in virology.
What about Dr Mercola (US) , Dr McCullough (US), Dr Geert Vanden Bossche (Belgium), Prof Luc Montagnier (France), Dr Mike Yeadon (UK), etc.. who have been exposing this scam since 2020? Have you ever heard of them?
If you haven't it's because they have no access to the media in a global dictatorship in the making.
Yes, Dr. Malone apparently did make a valuable contribution to mRNA research, about 30 years ago. It's interesting that he wants "credit" for inventing the vaccine, and he also says it's dangerous. So shouldn't he really be getting the blame instead?
How many times are you going to post that same comment? You are correct though. You do waste your time on me. I don't buy misinformation, particularly the sort financed by a foreign enemy.
Sorry Bob, it is not a conspiracy theory, it is a follow-the money theory. Can you explain how it is that Remdesivir, Molnupiravir, and Paxlovid - all patented, expensive treatments with no safety history at all - fly through the approval process after relatively little testing - for Remdesivir, a single, non-peer reviewed trial involving just over 1000 patients (about 500 in each arm) - while off-patent, inexpensive FDA approved drugs with extraordinary safety profiles proven over decades of use that have proven anti-inflammatory and anti- viral properties - and for IVM, with now over 76 trials involving over 57,000 patients - are dismissed as ineffective? How about the media smear campaign claiming that IVM is no more than horse dewormer and the wildly exaggerated claims of excessive calls into poison control centers? https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/the-great-ivermectin-deworming-hoax/article_19b8f2a6-0f29-11ec-94c1-4725bf4978c6.html
You have to be willfully blind not to see that there is an unholy alliance between big pharma and our health agencies. Big pharma has big influence, and as this article suggests, it has influence over newsrooms as well.
BTW, invermectin could have a million trials and be deemed safe - for people who have worms. It's quite a leap to say that makes it effective against a virus. Aspirin is safe too, if used as directed. But it's hardly relevant to Covid. Maybe it would lower your fever a little. And in that way it will at least do something. I'm wondering, what ever happened to that hydroclorowhatever? Haven't heard much about it lately.
In fact, conservatives without much education are the truly useful idiots for big pharma. They don't know that the Party they vote for has been the one protecting big pharma profits for decades. The Party that makes sure that Americans pay the highest precription costs in the world.
And the funny thing: big pharma says they need those big profits to invest in research that will bring us new miracle drugs. And when they actually succeed, the same people that made the profits possible don't trust the new drugs. You just can't make this up.
Right. Dems have done so much to reign in big pharma. In fact, the only politician who has gone after big pharma in the last few decades is Trump. You continue to display your level of ignorance, and are simply too stupid to see it.
"Are ACIP members aware that FDA have authorized a formulation change for the Pfizer adult vaccine based only on “analytical comparability” and without any biological assessment of the impact on safety or efficacy? In other words, all clinical data to date (including in children) for the Pfizer vaccine has been with the old formulation. This will affect all those Americans who will now be receiving the booster doses. As someone with experience in pharmaceutical development it is inconceivable why FDA did not ask for, or why Pfizer did not perform any in vitro transfection, in vivo toxicology, biodistribution or even human safety studies. Your committee has just given the green light for a formulation for which there are NO SAFETY OR EFFICACY DATA.
But I guess you are ok with all that right? The reason you have not heard much about HcQ is because your head is firmly implanted in a place where the sun never shines, as is the case with most brain dead liberals.
Thanks but I will trust the FDA over some anonymous person on a comment thread on a fringe website any day.
And regarding "brain dead liberals?" I don't think that way about conservatives. It is a little disturbing that so many of them don't have much education. That makes them easy marks for people who would spread misinformation. I wonder, with people like you, do you do it to intentionally harm people, or do you actually believe this stuff?
I posted letters from actual doctors along with questions that Fauci and the FDA refuse to answer. In your comment, a period after "I don't think" would be appropriate. Your opinion of conservatives is clear and the level of your willful ignorance is equally as clear.
At least she has had a response. I have written letters and posted information about my adverse reaction to the first vaccination with response from anyone. I am 91 years old and have still not recovered from the vaccination and no one seems to care.
I am so sorry to hear that. This ordeal has been a horrible wake up call for many hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of people about how corrupt an indifferent many of the world's "health officials" truly are. Carl Pedersen I pray that you will receive help.
We would be far better off if the FDA had listened to doctors who were actually treating patients as early as March 2020 using HcQ and/or IVM along with other supplements and having very positive outcomes. It is people like you, our health agencies, and big pharma that literally have the blood of millions on their hands because early treatments that worked were not just ignored, but demonized. There were no vaccines in March 2020, and our health agencies recommended little more than palliative care - go home, get some rest, and when you turn blue, come back and we will put you on a ventilator. Roughly 20% of prescriptions written are for re-purposing of an FDA approved drug to treat an off-label condition. IVM has been used to treat a number of off-label conditions successfully, Covid being one more. Of course, if effective treatments were made widely available, there would be no need for vaccines, big pharma would have lost out on big profits, millions of lives would have been saved, but then, Trump would likely still be president, and we could not allow that to happen, regardless of how many lives were lost, right?
Nice try. Again. Invermectin is not prescribed for Covid by ethical physicians because IT DOESN'T WORK. And the time frame you reference is closer to when people like you were pushing hydroclorowhatever. Whatever happened to it? How come nobody is still pushing it anymore? Or bleach?
Tell that to the people of Uttar Pradesh India. As I said, you have your head firmly planted up you a$$. Your bleach comment reveals that you continue to simply repeat lies. HcQ is still being prescribed by real doctors who actually practice medicine by actually treating patients, just like doctors who prescribe Ivermectin. That you are unwilling to read the studies does not mean that it does not work. You would rather see people die that be proven wrong.
So now we're going to India for medical expertise? I guess you have to go far and wide to find somebody who buys your BS. And of course many of the best Indian doctors are right here in the US. The pay is better. They don't buy it either.
"Brianne heard back right away, receiving a canned rejection note from none other than Dr. Eric J. Rubin, NEJM editor-in-chief and member of the FDA’s review committee that recommended covid shots be okayed for five-year-olds."
This is the same Rubin who lied to the FDA and said:
"We're never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it."
That lying bastard knew it was unsafe and should be prosecuted for being complicit in the murder of children via medical malpractice and malfeasance!
There was a pre-print of a scientific publication that was going to be published before the FDA session and the editor (Elsevier) was contacted by Pfizer to block the article because it was going to affect the deliberation.
That's what you call "Believe in Science". It's politics, it has nothing to do with Science.
Thank you for covering Ms. Dressen's story. I think it's important for our critics to remember that a great number of vaccine skeptics began our journey as vaccine true believers. It isn't conspiracy theories, or dark rabbit holes, that led us into this camp. It is personal experience and, in Dressen's case, a great deal of courage. The same qualities that led her to enroll in a clinical trial are clearly shining here: a true, unselfish devotion to helping others. No surprise that she's a preschool teacher.
I had a Tdap vaccine 3 years ago, (wanting just tetanus but pharmacy said they didn’t have it) and developed severe noise sensitivity and tinnitus post vaccine as well. I also developed Hypnic Jerks, twitches and Hashimotos. It’s unfathomable how the governments expect everyone to line up for this experiment. I can’t imagine what it would do to me seeing how I’ve suffered from one that’s been tested and approved. I feel so bad for the people that are injured and going through such gaslighting.
Jennifer, I am so sorry to hear that. It sounds like you developed what used to be called St. Vitus's Dance, a long known reaction to vaccines. Aluminum is the adjuvant in the tdap vaccine. It is one of the most highly toxic substances to living things. But the CDC insists its safe to injuect, based on no evidence whatsoever.
I can highly recommend the work of Dr. Suzanne Humphries, who began to research vaccines only after administering thousands of them. She wrote Dissolving Illusions, which should be read by anyone before agreeing to a vaccine. https://dissolvingillusions.com/
Thank you, Cici. I read about St. Vitus, it wasn’t as bad as that. And I knew it had to be the aluminum! I am much better now but it took months of research and various treatments. Supplements and sauna helped the most. It cost me so much money and time. I never heard of that book and will be adding it to my library, thank you.
This article is incredibly important and chilling for two reasons: 1) It shows how a person obviously injured by a vaccine was ignored by public health officials and 2) Because it shows that the “watchdog press” is actively suppressing such stories and seems to be under orders to censor revelations that could challenge myriad elements of the authorized COVID narrative.
Like this author, I am a “freelance” journalist who has written many COVID stories the mainstream press won’t cover. But writing “contrarian” stories is just half the battle. Once you’ve written a piece that “challenges the narrative,” you also have to find some news organization (preferably with a large audience) that will publish the story. As I have learned, good luck with this part of the project.
Linked below is a piece I wrote that documents how the mainstream press ignored what I thought was a “Page-1” blockbuster story. This story happened to be about people who almost certainly had COVID months before the virus was supposed to be “spreading” in America. People can agree with this theory or not. The point I would like to make with this post is that NO mainstream media journalists are willing to seriously investigate this possibility. It’s a taboo subject, something I have learned from my own email exchanges with reporters at well-known news organizations (like the Wall Street Journal).
Speaking for myself, I don’t know how any established narratives are ever going change if no accepted press organization is ever going to challenge these narratives.
What Ms. Bonvie’s excellent article tells me is that we need some “whistle blowers” in journalism who are brave enough to come forward and confirm that dissenting articles are indeed being spiked.
Anyone at this site is welcome to contact me if they want more details of my own experiences about reporters who are unwilling to write certain COVID stories. My email is: wjricejunior@gmail.com.
Thank you for pursing this story. No, no mainstream news outlet will publish these stories, so journalists like yourself and others who have left mainstream (like Sharyl Attkisson and Alex Berenson) are doing this work independently.
Have you heard of the "Trusted News Initiative"? It is a consortium of mainstream news outlets wedded to narrative that Vaccines Can Do No Harm. This, despite the fact that the US Supreme Court ruled that vaccines were "unavoidably unsafe."
You sound like someone who is just waking up to how controlled mainstream news has been for a very long time. This is an outstanding resource to understand what's been going on since before you were born:
The independent journalist George Webb also discovered what you did. I find his videos a bit hard to follow, but he has put his news stories into short books
Sharyl Attkisson has written about how her stories were spiked but this was long before covid.
Unfortunately a lot of people (most people) won't wake up until they or someone they know has a bad reaction to the jab. But good journalists who care can create a healthy media alternative, so that when a msm journo is ready to blow the whistle, they have somewhere to go.
Thanks for the tips. I agree it will take people going around or outside of the "gatekeepers of the news" to get the truth to large numbers of people. I posted this because I don't think many people realize all the important journalism that is being blocked by editors who are not interested in pursuing real investigations of important topics. Note that I never say that news organizations have to agree with my conclusions. My gripe is that these "investigative" news organizations won't even authorize any investigations to look into these possibilities.
So the Wall Street Journal rejected your submission? You are aware are you not that the Wall Street Journal has the same ownership as Fox News? Are they in on it too? They will probably be surprised to hear that they are part of some massive left-wing conspiracy.
I have shared many emails with a reporter at the Wall Street Journal who said she was interested in investigating early spread. She actually interviewed Brandie McCain, one of the subjects of my reporting and told me the interview went great. I mailed this reporter copies of Tim McCain's medical records. I was led to believe a story might be coming and this never happened - just like the lady in this article was interviewed by the New York Times, but no story ever appeared. About 25 news organizations did reject my "early spread" story, but I don't think I submitted it to the Wall Street Journal. I only submitted it to publications that run freelance articles. Reporters at the paper have read the article that was finally published. Trust me. The Wall Street Journal's reporters also know what COVID stories they can't run. But so do reporters at EVERY mainstream media news organization. That's the story.
I'm no expert but I would expect that the WSJ gets lots of submissions and rejects most of them. That is not evidence of some kind of conspiracy. Perhaps you should submit your paper here. They are likely to have a harder time finding content and it sounds like what you want to write about would fit with their mission, whatever that is. Probably that they see the money Fox makes at stoking division and conspiracy, and they want a piece of the action.
I'm not talking about publications that reject freelance submissions. I'm talking about a newsroom full of reporters who will not investigate legitimate news tips. Here's a quote from original post: "The point I would like to make with this post is that NO mainstream media journalists are willing to seriously investigate this possibility. It’s a taboo subject, something I have learned from my own email exchanges with reporters at well-known news organizations (like the Wall Street Journal)."
I'm not whining because the WSJ didn't 't run my story. I'm concerned that the WSJ has no reporter who is willing to seriously investigate what I am trying to seriously investigate ..... Just like the NY Times has no reporters who will seriously investigate vaccine injuries. You can read my story that one alternative media finally did publish and tell me why every other publication I submitted it to, did not run it. Nobody even asked me any questions or to see any of my evidence .... except for an editor at one site. And this editor and site have now been banned by Twitter.
Look, I know it must be tough to try to get by as a freelance writer, but I think it's a leap to think your work was rejected because of some kind of conspiracy. I mostly read the mainstream media and I recall articles speculating about earlier instances of Covid. I think it's more likely that the WSJ rejected your article because it was a subject that had already been covered and the weight of the evidence did not support your conclusion.
So you think the mainstream journalists have looked into "early spread" and rejected it because there was no supporting evidence? If you find any links to these articles - showing that reporters looked into this evidence - please share with me. I'd like to read them. As you will see if you read my main stories on the McCains, the Seattle Times and Palm Beach Post did run questioning stories early on .... and later dropped this line of inquiry. For example, I sent reporters at these papers info on the McCain's cases and they had no interest in following up or reporting my findings. My article actually supported articles their reporters had reported, which said the same thing. Why did they suddenly drop this area of investigation? They didn't believe their own reporting. Their own stories contained no good reasons to doubt the people making these claims. That is, there is no strong evidence that debunks these claims. In fact, there is copious evidence that supports these claims.
It's my understanding there are seven other reporting systems. VAERS is extremely flawed and at one point a whistleblower said she had proof the CDC was covering up more than 250k more. The system did not have very many options. When u went on there, people contacted CDC directly to report often if serious bcuz it didn't offer that option when reporting. If they did that, some found that their description of what they suffered and the VAERS description of what they suffered was two different accts.
This is great news and I hope she is successful. This type of action is needed against any hospital or health system that refused to administer Ivermectin as prescribed by a practicing physician. I hope she able to fully expose the unholy alliance between big pharma, our health agencies, hospitals, hospital systems, the media, much of academia, medical journals, etc. One problem, however, will be that because most of the MSM is complicit, getting through and accurate coverage will likely be problematic.
Hurray, thank you for posting that, Barnes. I think there will be many more like her to come. Stew Peters has done a good job of getting the word out, and as I said to Bill Rice (above), we have to become the real media, at Substack, at our own websites, at smaller outlets that will grow, because msm is collapsing.
This fantastic video describes the numerous problems with Pfizer's clinical trials and the unconscionable deception on many levels. The FDA went along with it.
Anyone interested can go to VAERSAnalysis.info which compares Adverse Effects from Covid vaccines to all other vaccines combined since 1990. That this data is ignored or downplayed is in itself a sign of corruption. For example, for all other vaccines combined, there have been 9461 reported deaths following vaccination since 1990. For covid, there have been 21,745 reported deaths after vaccination since December 2020, yet we are told there is nothing to see here, move along. That site provides a wealth of data. And yes, it should be 1/7/22, not 21.
Brianne may wish to take her story to the BMJ, as they have been far more receptive to other viewpoints compared to most medical journals. They recently covered the corruption within the Pfizer trials and I've not seen any other organisation do this (besides Project Veritas who brought the original story to light):
These people need to be brought to justice. It won't be enough for the shots to be stopped. These actions are criminal and everyone at the FDA, NIH, CDC, and the pharma companies who has been complicit needs to be tried and jailed.
You are a psychic. Crimes against humanity complaint filed in Texas and the list of defendants includes FDA, NIH, CDC, Murderna, Schizer, CastraZenica, etc...
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/21/criminal-complaint-texas-attorney-general-crimes-against-humanity/
Thanks for your support!
We at Murderna care about our guinea pigs:
https://librti.com/page/view-video?id=1515
We at Schizer care about your children too:
https://librti.com/page/view-video?id=1438
Please renew your jab subscription on a quarterly basis to avoid dealing with the upcoming variant which will be 30% more dangerous than the prevailing one.
When I look at the concerns and censorship of these vaccines, I think about how none of my doctors and few people know about the millions of DES (Diethylstilbestrol (DES) babies who were doused in this extremely strong estrogen every day when they were a fetus. WE, the DES babies have been forgotten. DES is a synthetic form of the female hormone estrogen. It was prescribed to pregnant women between 1940 and 1971 to prevent miscarriage, premature labor, and related complications of pregnancy) babies. However, the drug companies knew it didn't prevent miscarriages, that it was a carcinogen and that in animals the impact of having been exposed to this drug lasted down 7 generations. Most of those male and female babies exposed to this disastrous drug don't even know it because it was put in vitamins and that's all their mothers knew. My mom was a nurse, so when the rare cancers started appearing in young women who were DES babies, she knew to tell me. It wasn't until over 20 years later after the moms took this drug that the rare cancers in women exposed to DES in the womb started. Interestingly, the CDC which supported so much of the DES research, removed it all from their website a few weeks after the election For most of us the impact has been on almost every aspect of our life. You can go to the DES Action website which describes it all. https://desaction.org If you have had several of the following concerns, talk to your doctor and investigate the DES website. Everyone knows about Tuskegee Airmen and the experimental drugs they were given, but so few know about DES. WHY? Research indicates that DES caused the following problems, but different individuals had different combinations of these problems: 1. You were described as a baby who was always sick (immune system weakened.) 2. Your mother had breast cancer indicative of too much estrogen when she was pregnant with you..
3. Your period came early (mine was in 5th grade) 4. If you were a DES female, you often had two heavy periods in the same month.
5. If you were a DES male, you had Testicular cancer at a young age (possibly the DES grandsons also have a higher rate - little research, but my son had and I know 2 other DES women whose sons did.
6. Your daughter had a higher chance of starting her period late (my d. started in mid high school). There also is a higher probability of tibia torsion and other muscular skeletal changes in DES grandbabies. Little is known about the DES great grandbabies, but one researcher opined that muscular skeletal changes seemed more common.
7. As a female you were born with a T-shaped uterus and could not carry babies. 8. As a female you effaced a few months into your pregnancy. Some of these women also could not carry babies, but for some like me , suddenly the effacing stopped in time. 9. You had an ectopic pregnancy which are more common in DES daughters. 10. You had preeclampsia. 26.4% of DES Daughters dealing with preeclampsia during their pregnancies compared with 13.7% of unexposed.
11.You had Paraovarian Cysts which are more common in those exposed to DES. 12.You had adenosis. DES Daughters often have sections of the vagina lined with glandular cells most often found lining the uterus, fallopian tubes and cervix. When these glandular cells are located in the vagina, they are called adenosis. While this is completely normal tissue in the body, it is in the wrong place. 13.You have rheumatoid arthritis which is more common in DES individuals especially when it starts very early. 14. As a male were you born with a hypospadia 15. There is still a need for more research on sexuality differences in DES and non DES exposed individuals. One researcher reported that in his non-random group of DES sons, “Somewhere between one-quarter and one-third of members of the DES Sons’ network since 1999 have indicated that gender dysphoria, transsexual outcomes, and/or sexual health issues were among their top concerns. 16. For men: Cryptorchidism: DES has been associated with extremely small testes and/or undescended testes (cryptorchidism). Men born with undescended testicles (even if their mother was not given DES) have an increased risk for developing testicular cancer. When found early, testicular cancer can generally be cured. All men should practice testicular self-exam regularly. My son would have died if he hadn't done those regular checks. 17. Hypospadias is a condition where the urethral opening on the penis is in the wrong place, emerging somewhere down the shaft instead of at the tip. In many cases hypospadias can be corrected with surgery. A higher number of DES exposed males were born with these. 18. A French study by Michel Tournaire, MD, an OBGYN with the Hospital of Paris, and the DES France Association Network, showed six types of birth defects occurred more frequently among DES Grandchildren, in decreasing risk: esophagus defects; other digestive defects; male genital tract anomalies (especially undescended testicle(s) and hypospadias); cleft lip/palate; musculoskeletal anomalies; and congenital heart defects. The researchers did find a greater likelihood of cerebral palsy among DES Grandchildren that corresponded with a higher rate of preterm birth in the DES exposed group.
What do you suppose the chances are of success for these lawsuits? Heck, though. When they're all thrown out of court you can say the judges are all corrupt too. Geez. Is EVERYBODY corrupt?
Crimes are not just been committed in the US.
Below is one of the 2 International Criminal Court cases that I am aware of. If US courts reject legitimate complaints, the ICC is already accepting them:
https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/10/uk-team-file-complaint-of-crimes-against-humanity-with-the-international-criminal-court/
The UK is currently been investigated -
"London Metropolitan Police criminal investigation number 6029679/21 is now underway."
https://drtrozzi.org/2022/01/15/now-covid-culprits-in-uk-gov-under-criminal-investigation/
So the International Criminal Court is investigating the USA? What's it going to do if it finds us guilty? Thanks for the laugh.
BTW, is it also going to investigate Russia when it invades Ukraine. The first large-scale land war in Europe since WWII? Good God Russia is a backward country.
As is usa, pure criminals on both sides
Best of luck. Nonsense tends to be tossed out of court.
In paragraph 13, there is a typo. The condition is transverse myelitis, not traverse myelitis. I am speaking from personal experience as I was diagnosed with this potentially devastating condition some 20 years ago. I was fortunate enough to make an almost complete recovery. Hence, why I will NEVER subject myself to this horrific gene therapy.
Thanks for pointing that out, it has been fixed.
This "horrific gene therapy" has saved millions of lives.
I concur. Below is the proof.
https://librti.com/page/view-video?id=1438
And Israel is proving you correct:
Israeli vaccine advisor: “We have made mistakes”
https://unherd.com/thepost/israeli-vaccine-chief-we-have-made-mistakes/
I have better things to do than click your posts. For all I know, you are Russian. Why would any sane person trust some anonymous person on a comment thread when there are perfectly reliable sources of it from journalists and others who take ethical standards seriously.
Bobby, bobby are you msm spoonfed and brainwashed? Ha ha. It really surprises me at a constant how non critical thinkers get aggro because ignorance is their wise choice... ha, ha.
So you are one of those "critical thinkers." Well, I'm so glad to have you around. The rest of us probably wouldn't know what to do without your wise council.
I see you have troll status as well bobby... shame man
Yes! Live and learn
You're replying to an online troll!
You're just an online troll and are not worth one second of my time.
Correct. There is zero chance I will buy anything you say. You can't be trusted.
I am not posting verifiable information online for trolls because I know what they're doing online is disinformation, misinformation and mass formation psychosis and are paid for it.
Thank you for this article Linda Bovie! Your journalism is another piece of this giant (crazy!) puzzle - one day, all of the pieces will be assembled & we will be able to see what-on-earth happened to us all. I appreciate your work as it helps connect people (like myself) who have questions, are looking for answers and want to hear voices other than than mainstream narrative. Keep up the good work!
The point I'd illustrate is how RARE Ms. Bonvie's journalism is. You simply cannot find pieces like this in the mainstream media. She references the press event hosted by Sen. Johnson. I found the invitation that the senator's staffers sent to all D.C. media when they held this event. Apparently, not one "corporate" news organization covered this event, or if any reporter did, he or she didn't file any story. All the stories I have seen (and videos) are from "alternative media" sources. There IS a "blackout" of "contrarian" COVID stories. This in itself is a scandalous story that someone needs to tell.
How exactly is it helpful to us to read about the experiences of a person in a clinical trial of a vaccine that is not even approved for use in the US? You would have to go to Britain to get it.
Yes, you certainly need to be wary of that mainstream. You know, the things most people believe, like the sky is blue and water is wet. Better be safe and stick to the alternative explanations.
Hi Bob, I actually do believe the sky is blue and that water is wet. In my post, I didn’t mention I was looking for alternative explanations - I was thanking Linda for writing this piece, as I appreciate hearing differing voices other than the mainstream narrative. I try to gather information from a variety of sources as this helps me understand what is going on. I’m not a scientist, nor do I pretend be one. Nor am I a conspiracy theorist. But I am a skeptic at heart and therefore want to explore all the various pieces of information available to me before I arrive at a conclusion - and that applies to almost any topic, not just science. Linda’s piece shares a woman’s story of her vaccine ordeal - the reactions she suffered, the lack of support from health officials and her attempt to get answers and share her experience with the general public. Am I “wary of that mainstream”? Perhaps that is your interpretation. I’d describe "that mainstream" as one part of the story - it may surprise you to hear that I follow mainstream news, but I’m always looking for more information and I’m glad that journalists like Linda are writing pieces such as this.
One question for you Bob - why do you think Brianne Dressen’s story isn’t covered by “that mainstream”?
Bobby really is indoctrinated and a non thinker, shame man. Probably not very literate as well.
Wow. I could take a guess why the "mainstream" didn't cover this particular case. (Maybe something about not wanting anything to do with senator nut
job's political stunts.) But first, it would really help to have an idea of what's mainstream and what is not. Nearly all big media is corporate. Single entities own multiple TV stations and newspapers, and even among the largest of them they do anything but speak in one voice. Nothing Tucker Carlson ever said or wrote would pass muster with the New York Times. So to suggest that there is some sort of deal between them to publish or suppress certain "news" is not very credible.
And this woman's story is just that. One woman's story. An anecdote, however unfortunate, and a one-sided view at that. It might be interesting to hear what her doctors have to say, in the interest of a fair and balanced view.
In any event, to focus on one story and ignore the big picture is the opposite of science. It may evoke your sympathy, but it doesn't teach us anything applicable to the broader society.
Here you go Bob. More documented cases of adverse effects from the vaccines. This is what real investigative journalism looks like, and you don't find this at Fox, the WSJ, NBC/CBS/ABC, NY Times or any MSM outlets.
https://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2022/01/19/200-published-reports-of-vaccine-linked-medical-problems/
And for real stories of real people who have been affected by these "safe" vaccines, start here and page through the next several posts.
https://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2021/09/06/introduction-vaccine-voices-film-festival/
After reading your comments, it is clear that you have bought into the narrative 100% and have no interest in hearing the other side. Your interest is likely more in line with wanting to suppress alternative views. An honest look at the data reveals that the vaccines are not nearly as effective or as safe as advertised, while the mainstream media and big pharma push a narrative that one of the safest drugs in history that has been used to treat a number of off-label conditions somehow turned dangerous because covid.
Compare the AE's reported from the vaccines since December 2020 to the AEs reported for all other vaccines combined since 1990 and explain to me why the AEs for these experimental gene therapies should not be explored more fully. Also explain how it is that VigiAccess reports roughly 5800 AEs for Ivermectin after by now over 4 billion people treated since 1992 - yet it is Ivermectin that is vilified by the media.
Your posts are largely snarky, substance free assertions. Others have provided data and analysis. As Thomas Sowell said, "It is usually futile to argue facts and analysis with people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance". That fits you to a T.
The following comment says don't waste your time with online trolls. I would say you appear to be wasting a lot of time looking for conspiratorial rabbit holes where you can find validation for what you already want to believe.
It is not my job to "research" these issues. I am not a scientist. That's their job. Most of the people who say they are doing research don't seem to have a clue what that really is. Or a very good grounding in science.
I'm curious: If you were in a car accident would you go to the internet to find a way to patch yourself up? Or would you go to an emergency room where there are people who know what to do?
As I stated earlier, those that refuse to question what is happening and claim to "follow the science" are the most scientifically illiterate people on the planet, and while not the exclusive domain of the left, it is predominately those on the left who blindly follow "the experts". Feynman had a couple of very good quotes - "I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned" and "Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts".
You're just an online troll and are not worth one second of my time.
Don't waste your time with online trolls.
These are people paid by the global predators for disinformation.
If you're healthy today and are injected with 40trillion mRNA nano-particles and die tomorrow, they'll tell you that it's coincidence. But when that happens to millions of people around the world they still call that coincidence. They tell you that what you see as red is actually green - they are paid for mass formation psychosis and you should just ignore them.
Except that I find a number of replies to bob, including yours, to be informative. That bob simply posts snarky, substance and fact free assertions reveals a level of ignorance that is in a word breathtaking. I have yet to see a single post from little ol bob that backs up any of his assertions.
For those of you who are interested, this is what Russian disinformation looks like. And these people really are paid. At Russian wages, which are about to take a dive when Putin makes the most disastrous mistake of his career, but at least it's something.
My apologies - I see I misspelled your last name - Linda Bonvie!
Thank you for this article. Very insightful look into how the corrupt Narrative is being protected. I believe the headline, however, is erroneous - the million plus VAERS reports include a significant number of foreign reports. As of 1/7/2022, there were over a million VAERS reports, but 754,900 of those were "American" reports. See https://vaersanalysis.info/2022/01/14/vaers-summary-for-covid-19-vaccines-through-01-07-2022/.
So there are over one million VAERs reports, but so far less than one million "American" VAERS reports. To say "A Million Americans Were Injured by Covid Vaccines" based on the VAERS reports is therefore not entirely accurate. It overstates the number of domestic VAERS reports. But at the same time, it dramatically understates the number of vaccine injuries, as we all know VAERS is underreported. I don't have any suggestions for capturing that nuance in a headline.
Many people will not relate a medical problem to have been caused from the vaccine especially if older, and their Dr. told them it wasn’t related. I’ve heard that numerous times but since then have come to understand Drs. who most often are under a corporate thumb were advised to not say anything that would lead to people not wanting to get the vax. Most people tend to “believe” their Drs. not realizing medicine has changed over the years, and Drs. aren’t nearly as independent thinking as years ago when they had their own practices and medicine wasn’t quite so corrupt & controlled by big pharma.
So all the doctors are corrupt? Who do you see when you get sick?
Def not your msm dokkies... they are all baffled while getting the dough, ha ha.
Don't consult a doctor because we own them too.
YOU own the doctors? How do you do that exactly?
At Schizer, we care about your kids:
https://librti.com/page/view-video?id=1438
At Murderna, we’re proud of our guinea pigs:
https://librti.com/page/view-video?id=1515
Its a mess. Hopefully, there are some who will speak the truth. Go to one that is not under the thumb of a corporate entity but rather independent. Then they are more likely to still be independent thinking.
Really. And how exactly is a person supposed to determine which doctors are corrupt and which are not? I can't believe anybody buys this stuff.
Easy. Any doctor who refuses to allow treatment using an FDA approved drug with an extraordinary safety profile proven over decades of use and with proven anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties is likely bought and paid for by big pharma. Claiming that an FDA approved drug has not been approved to treat any off-label condition is an example of dis-information in that it implies that drugs are never to be used in such a manner when in fact, roughly 20% of prescriptions written are for that purpose. That you swallow that kind of nonsense hook, line, and sinker is simply another tell to your level of ignorance.
Invermectin has "proven anti-viral properties?" Since when? And just because doctors sometimes prescribe things off-label is not a good argument for doing it in this case. The reason they refuse to prescribe it for Covid is because IT DOESN'T WORK.
I get reports from the UK daily with statistics on vaccine injuries. They are much more truthful.
Do you also get the stats from injuries and deaths from Covid? There are lots of dead people who wished they would have taken the "risk" of a vaccine injury.
You mean the data that the CDC has failed to publish even when FOIA'd?
We can tell you're obviously a pharma shill.
Indeed. I MUST be a pharma shill. It's all a conspiracy. What a bleak existence you must lead.
Ah, a classic 'muh conspiracy' response. Outdated mainstream response.
I think a bleaker existence is one accepting blood money for cash payments based on the mass murder of children using defective products.
I'm curious how many hours a day you spend obsessing about this. And there is nothing outdated about conspiracy theories. They have been around as long as there have been conspiracies. In fact, on a website like this, you might even say they have become "mainstream."
"the million plus VAERS reports include a significant number of foreign reports"
This is incorrect. Using the CDC Wonder search (which is connected to VAERS), the categories for US/Territories/Unknown (as it's primarily for Americans: other countries have their own surveillance), the total number was "1,473,687", and no, it wasn't skewered by 'unknown' which was a 'mere' "187,978".
In contrast, Foreign was 'only' "420,948" (it's counted separately from the above category, so it's 'on top of' and not 'exclusively to'). This is why we check the original VAERS database and not some third hand website.
I've uploaded the appropriate screenshots taken from the search:
https://postimg.cc/gallery/nhGJG2W
(Those wishing to repeat the search themselves, can do so here: https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D8)
The "corrupt narrative." "as we all know." Good God. There is speculation that conspiracy theories find fertile ground in people who feel powerless. Who feel their lives are somehow controlled and harmed by shadowy and nefarious actors. And now we are to believe that it's the government, the one that we elect, that's behind it all.
Of course that makes perfect sense if you think the government we have is not the one we elected. It appears that conspiracy theories are much like lies. One leads to another.
'Muh conspiracy'
At least we can spell VAERS correctly, shill.
I'm very happy you know how to spell it. I would be even happier if you actually had the expertise to draw reasonable conclusions from millions of unverified raw statistics. But I suppose it's much simpler to be a play scientist than a real one.
What expertise to you have to statistically analyze the VAERS data or to even have an informed opinion about the statistical relevance of the VAERS data?
How many scientific publications have you read recently about the analysis of the VAERS data by scientists around the world?
How much do you get paid for spreading dissension on Western comment threads? How does your boss judge if you are doing and effective job at it? I'm just curious. In any event, what worked in 2016 will be a little harder to pull off now that we know you are among us. On some sites they have "spot the troll" contests.
You're just an online troll and are not worth one second of my time.
All VAAERS is is raw, unfiltered data, that has not been examined or studied in any depth in such a short time. To use it to draw scientific conclusions would be malpractice if you were a real scientist.
VAERS data has been around for more than 30 years. That's enough time to make a lot of statistical inferences.
Covid has not been around for 30 years. Your comment is nonsense.
You're obviously not a scientist.
First, it's VAERS, not "VAAERS".
Second, malpractice applies to practiced medicine, not data examination.
Third, the purpose of VAERS is to find early safety signals in the vaccines. If it wasn't meant to be examined, why the hell is it public?
Malpractice refers to many types of conduct and not just to doctors. And if a scientist misrepresents data or draws unwarranted conclusions from it, that qualifies as malpractice in my book.
Malpractice refers to practice.
Examination of data is not a form of 'practice', nor is drawing conclusions.
I conclude you're wrong. I have not broken any laws in doing so.
There is nothing new about scientific malpractice, and it does not have to break the law. In fact the field of vaccine "science" seems to draw more than its fair share of quacks and people who manage to publish things in the major journals, which then have to retract them and apologize for being taken in.
Sadly, by that point in time may be millions will have been fooled. And I guess it must just be a human instinct to dig in rather than admit you have been played for a fool.
It probably shouldn't be because it probably does more harm than good in the hands of people who don't understand it.
Thankfully, no-one shares your draconian views of censorship and secrecy simply because people disagree with you on conclusions on the data.
Further, there is no evidence to back up your claim it "does more harm than good", and sticking the speculative word "probably" won't save face either.
I would not presume to draw any conclusions from the data. There are experts who do those things and I trust them. There seems to be a very large deficit of trust on this website.
I am not a scientist. I am a curious customer.
Nor am I. But my doctors are at a highly-regarded medical research university, and when I have questions I go there for answers. Not to the internet and certainly not to right-wing "news" sites that are clearly out to make a buck from people looking for validation of what they already want to believe.
If you don't go to the internet and "not to right-wing "news" sites" then why are you here?
Also, the 'profiteering' aspect has been debunked. The pharmaceutical companies made $34 billion last year, and yet you're griping over a few dollars? Hypocrisy much.
"a highly-regarded medical research university" ah yes, the University of Generic.
I'm here just out of curiosity and you will be happy to hear I won't be here for much longer. BTW, one of the biggest reasons big pharma makes so much money is because the GOP refuses to allow Medicare and Medicaid to negotiate drug prices. And they are by far the largest purchasers of prescription drugs. The GOP makes sure Americans pay the highest drug prices in the world.
And it's part of the University of California system if you must know.
I'm so sorry this happened to Brianne. What struck me as particularly interesting was the fact that many of her symptoms, although triggered by the vaccination, were remarkably similar to the symptoms I experienced more than five and a half years ago while fighting a severe viral infection. Subsequently, I was diagnosed with POTS (Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome), post viral syndrome, and post viral fatigue. I was told the illness was "self-limiting" and that I would "improve in time." I never did. I saw over 15 doctors in the year that followed and no one offered any treatment despite the fact I begged for anti-viral meds, anything to stop the progression of my illness and restore me to good health.
After many months with no improvement, I was officially diagnosed with ME (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis), also commonly called Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (I hate that term), a predominantly post viral illness with no known cure, numerous comorbid medical conditions, like POTS, and no FDA approved treatment. It's a horribly debilitating chronic illness that destroys the health and the lives of people unfortunate enough to develop it. It often follows a viral infection but can be triggered by vaccines, Lyme Disease, and many other "things." It's a disease three times as prevalent as Multiple Sclerosis (MS) but hardly any doctors, or people for that matter, are even aware of it or, in the case of doctors, know how to diagnose it using the 2015 IOM Clinician's Guide for ME/CFS.
The aforementioned "guide,' which was sponsored by the FDA, CDC, HHS, VA, and other govenrment agencies, has NEVER, to my knowledge, made it into the hands of ONE SINGLE DOCTOR in the US. I wonder why. I've had to provide copies of it to my doctors to educate them about my disease since ME is not taught in most medical schools. Some doctors even still mistakenly believe it's not a "real" disease despite over 6,000 scientific peer reviewed articles published about ME. Since I became ill, I've faced widespread bias from the medical profession because of my ME diagnosis many refusing to even acknowledge it.
Sadly, the number of people with ME is expected to grow due to the pandemic, Long Covid, and the vaccine injured like Brianne. ME experts predict about 50% of people with Long Covid will be diagnosed with ME since many already meet the diagnostic criteria for this disease after six months of continuous symptoms. It's unknown how many vaccine injured will develop ME but sadly it won't be an insignificant number.
I’m very sorry for how you’ve been treated, Lori. It’s unconscionable. I hope you do eventfully improve given even more time. Fibromyalgia is another condition I can think of where doctors dismiss people’s symptoms and often mistreat them emotionally. I used to work with a group of physicians who did this. So these patients would make their way to me, a nurse practitioner who was willing to listen, try new and alternative treatments, and confirm their suffering at the very least. At least they had a compassionate ear which all deserve.
The reality is that only about 2-3% of people diagnosed with ME ever recover. It's unlikely, given all my comorbidities that developed following the acute infection, that I will ever recover. I've accepted that several years ago and have moved on. However, given all the research on Long Covid, there may be some treatments in the very near future, that give me an improved quality of life. That would be nice indeed.
There is a non-trivial amount of evidence that serious viral and bacterial infections can lead to other diseases, particularly auto-immune disease. The exact connection is unknown to medical science, but there are numerous theories about it which are being investigated.
It's quite a leap though, to suggest that there is causation between vaccines and later disease. Long Covid is a direct result of the damage Covid does, to people's lungs, to their brains, their hearts and blood vessels, and other organs. Causation is clear. It's because they got Covid. I am not aware of any cases of long-Covid from vaccination. In fact, all the data we have now suggests that even if the vaccine has risks for some people, it clearly is far safer than getting Covid.
Or to put it a different way: If we had a database of people who got the vaccine and had no adverse events, the number would dwarf the VAERS database. Hundreds of millions to one. I'll take those odds any day.
The number is unknown but you know it will be significant. How exactly? Anecdotes? There has been plenty of reporting about long Covid. But according to this site, all of the information about vaccine injuries has been suppressed. All so big pharma can make a buck. Geez.
Maybe you should do a little research. You can start with Merck and Vioxx, because they did exactly what you say they would not do - suppress important information to make a buck. https://trialsitenews.com/mercks-deadly-vioxx-playbook-redux-a-debunked-smear-campaign-against-its-competing-drug-the-fda-approved-nobel-prize-honored-ivermectin/
How about Purdue Pharma and the opiod crisis?
I get a kick out of people who say they are doing "research" on the internet. They tend to have a poor understanding of what real science even is..
Yet one more substance free snarky comment. You have yet to provide any information to back up any assertion. As Linus correctly points out "Trust the science is the most anti-science statement ever. Questioning science is how you do science". Liberals have revealed themselves to be the most scientific illiterate people on the planet.
Question science is a perfectly reasonable thing to do. If you are a scientist. For a lay person to do it is an exercise in stupidity. Non-scientists have neither the knowledge nor the tools to do it. And conspiracy theories are a poor substitute. They lead to rational conclusions like believing Q-anon.
The exercise in stupidity is following the lead lemming over the cliff - exactly what fools like you are doing. It is clear that you have an inability to read or comprehend anything outside of your little bubble. You have made numerous erroneous comments that reveal your ignorance and have yet to post a single link to anything that backs up your assertions.
According to Dr. Jose Montoya, Infectious Disease Specialist and ME\CFS (ME) expert, "up to 11% of people who suffer a severe viral illness will develop a chronic, post viral illness like ME." Post viral illness has been seen with every pandemic around the world and, in the case of SARS, MERS, and Ebola, the numbers have even been higher, according to Dr. Ian Lipkin, the world reknown "virus hunter." Other ME\CFS specialists, like Dr. Lucinda Bateman of the Bateman Horne Center in SLC, Utah, and Dr. Walter Komaroff, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, agree. If you include the number of vaccine injured presenting with an ME like illness, the ME population can easily double. Right now, it's stands out about 2.5M in the US alone although we suspect that number is grossly underreported.
A segment of the worldwide ME population is vaccine hesitant since some have developed this horrible disease from a vaccine (e.g., the flu vaccine, hepatitis vaccine, HPV vaccine, etc). To make the situation even worse, the Covid vaccines have caused many in my ME community to suffer a crash, a severe exacerbation of symptoms, and some are still struggling to return to their baseline level of functioning after many months. This is not an acceptable vaccine outcome. Since so many of us are housebound or bedridden, and have little exposures, we've decided not to take the vaccine until and unless a safer one is developed for our patient population. Our government may not care about how we're being adversely affected by the vaccines but our community most certainly is and is tracking it. You can find out more about it on HealthRising.com. one of the best sites for information about ME which, by the way, was created by someone who has the disease and who has become a recognized expert on it, Cort Johnson.
Well, if you are housebound and have little interaction with other people then clearly the vaccine is not as important. But whatever the issue is, I will trust the experts to study it in a scientific way, and I will trust the consensus results. They may be wrong, but it's a lot more likely that some lonely voice in the wilderness is wrong. And I'm quite sure there are teams of experts in many places right now researching the issue of vaccine injuries and every other aspect of this disease. There has been reporting about vaccine injuries in mainstream publications for some time. And I do not believe conspiracy theories that suggest doctors or big pharma are trying to suppress the truth and intentionally injure people, for profit or not.
And one more comment. Yet another great article exposing what is clear corruption and possibly criminal behavior among a number of institutions involved in an unholy alliance. If the MSM was not fully bought and paid for by big pharma, as indicated in this article, this travesty would have been exposed a long time ago.
What would you say if I told you that that is a conspiracy theory, and that it's complete nonsense? There are tens of thousands of highly trained and intelligent people who work for both the mainstream media and the pharmaceutical companies. Do you mean to say they are all in on it? Not one has come forward to expose this massive fraud?
Where are they going to expose the fraud?
On Facebook?
Twitter?
YouTube?
Dr Malone the inventor of mRNA technology has been deplattformed by all those social media on behalf of the Biden administration and there are hundreds of honest scientists around the world who have been shut up including Luc Montagnier the nobel in virology.
What about Dr Mercola (US) , Dr McCullough (US), Dr Geert Vanden Bossche (Belgium), Prof Luc Montagnier (France), Dr Mike Yeadon (UK), etc.. who have been exposing this scam since 2020? Have you ever heard of them?
If you haven't it's because they have no access to the media in a global dictatorship in the making.
Yes, Dr. Malone apparently did make a valuable contribution to mRNA research, about 30 years ago. It's interesting that he wants "credit" for inventing the vaccine, and he also says it's dangerous. So shouldn't he really be getting the blame instead?
You're just an online troll and are not worth one second of my time.
How many times are you going to post that same comment? You are correct though. You do waste your time on me. I don't buy misinformation, particularly the sort financed by a foreign enemy.
Sorry Bob, it is not a conspiracy theory, it is a follow-the money theory. Can you explain how it is that Remdesivir, Molnupiravir, and Paxlovid - all patented, expensive treatments with no safety history at all - fly through the approval process after relatively little testing - for Remdesivir, a single, non-peer reviewed trial involving just over 1000 patients (about 500 in each arm) - while off-patent, inexpensive FDA approved drugs with extraordinary safety profiles proven over decades of use that have proven anti-inflammatory and anti- viral properties - and for IVM, with now over 76 trials involving over 57,000 patients - are dismissed as ineffective? How about the media smear campaign claiming that IVM is no more than horse dewormer and the wildly exaggerated claims of excessive calls into poison control centers? https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/the-great-ivermectin-deworming-hoax/article_19b8f2a6-0f29-11ec-94c1-4725bf4978c6.html
You have to be willfully blind not to see that there is an unholy alliance between big pharma and our health agencies. Big pharma has big influence, and as this article suggests, it has influence over newsrooms as well.
BTW, invermectin could have a million trials and be deemed safe - for people who have worms. It's quite a leap to say that makes it effective against a virus. Aspirin is safe too, if used as directed. But it's hardly relevant to Covid. Maybe it would lower your fever a little. And in that way it will at least do something. I'm wondering, what ever happened to that hydroclorowhatever? Haven't heard much about it lately.
Can't respond to my questions either, can you there Bob. You are proving to be a truly useful idiot for big pharma.
In fact, conservatives without much education are the truly useful idiots for big pharma. They don't know that the Party they vote for has been the one protecting big pharma profits for decades. The Party that makes sure that Americans pay the highest precription costs in the world.
And the funny thing: big pharma says they need those big profits to invest in research that will bring us new miracle drugs. And when they actually succeed, the same people that made the profits possible don't trust the new drugs. You just can't make this up.
Right. Dems have done so much to reign in big pharma. In fact, the only politician who has gone after big pharma in the last few decades is Trump. You continue to display your level of ignorance, and are simply too stupid to see it.
Another snarky, fact free assertion. IVMMETA and hcqmeta.com says differently. Maybe read Dr. Fareed's open letter to Fauci. https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/open-letter-to-dr-anthony-fauci-regarding-the-use-of-hydroxychloroquine-for-treating-covid-19/article_31d37842-dd8f-11ea-80b5-bf80983bc072.html
Or Dr. Zelenko's Senate testimony. https://principia-scientific.com/covid19-dr-zelenkos-statement-to-u-s-senate-committee-homeland-security/
And for a bit of an eye opener, https://trialsitenews.com/an-open-letter-to-dr-grace-lee-cdc-acip-chairperson-on-transparency/
From that article:
"Are ACIP members aware that FDA have authorized a formulation change for the Pfizer adult vaccine based only on “analytical comparability” and without any biological assessment of the impact on safety or efficacy? In other words, all clinical data to date (including in children) for the Pfizer vaccine has been with the old formulation. This will affect all those Americans who will now be receiving the booster doses. As someone with experience in pharmaceutical development it is inconceivable why FDA did not ask for, or why Pfizer did not perform any in vitro transfection, in vivo toxicology, biodistribution or even human safety studies. Your committee has just given the green light for a formulation for which there are NO SAFETY OR EFFICACY DATA.
But I guess you are ok with all that right? The reason you have not heard much about HcQ is because your head is firmly implanted in a place where the sun never shines, as is the case with most brain dead liberals.
Thanks but I will trust the FDA over some anonymous person on a comment thread on a fringe website any day.
And regarding "brain dead liberals?" I don't think that way about conservatives. It is a little disturbing that so many of them don't have much education. That makes them easy marks for people who would spread misinformation. I wonder, with people like you, do you do it to intentionally harm people, or do you actually believe this stuff?
I posted letters from actual doctors along with questions that Fauci and the FDA refuse to answer. In your comment, a period after "I don't think" would be appropriate. Your opinion of conservatives is clear and the level of your willful ignorance is equally as clear.
You should do some research on what type of people subscribe to conspiracy theories.
Thank you so much for this article, Ms. Bonvie, and thank you to Brianne Dressen for sharing her ordeal.
At least she has had a response. I have written letters and posted information about my adverse reaction to the first vaccination with response from anyone. I am 91 years old and have still not recovered from the vaccination and no one seems to care.
I am so sorry to hear that. This ordeal has been a horrible wake up call for many hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of people about how corrupt an indifferent many of the world's "health officials" truly are. Carl Pedersen I pray that you will receive help.
So do you think we would be better off if we had no doctors or scientists or vaccines, since they are all corrupt anyway?
We would be far better off if the FDA had listened to doctors who were actually treating patients as early as March 2020 using HcQ and/or IVM along with other supplements and having very positive outcomes. It is people like you, our health agencies, and big pharma that literally have the blood of millions on their hands because early treatments that worked were not just ignored, but demonized. There were no vaccines in March 2020, and our health agencies recommended little more than palliative care - go home, get some rest, and when you turn blue, come back and we will put you on a ventilator. Roughly 20% of prescriptions written are for re-purposing of an FDA approved drug to treat an off-label condition. IVM has been used to treat a number of off-label conditions successfully, Covid being one more. Of course, if effective treatments were made widely available, there would be no need for vaccines, big pharma would have lost out on big profits, millions of lives would have been saved, but then, Trump would likely still be president, and we could not allow that to happen, regardless of how many lives were lost, right?
Nice try. Again. Invermectin is not prescribed for Covid by ethical physicians because IT DOESN'T WORK. And the time frame you reference is closer to when people like you were pushing hydroclorowhatever. Whatever happened to it? How come nobody is still pushing it anymore? Or bleach?
Tell that to the people of Uttar Pradesh India. As I said, you have your head firmly planted up you a$$. Your bleach comment reveals that you continue to simply repeat lies. HcQ is still being prescribed by real doctors who actually practice medicine by actually treating patients, just like doctors who prescribe Ivermectin. That you are unwilling to read the studies does not mean that it does not work. You would rather see people die that be proven wrong.
So now we're going to India for medical expertise? I guess you have to go far and wide to find somebody who buys your BS. And of course many of the best Indian doctors are right here in the US. The pay is better. They don't buy it either.
"Brianne heard back right away, receiving a canned rejection note from none other than Dr. Eric J. Rubin, NEJM editor-in-chief and member of the FDA’s review committee that recommended covid shots be okayed for five-year-olds."
This is the same Rubin who lied to the FDA and said:
"We're never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it."
That lying bastard knew it was unsafe and should be prosecuted for being complicit in the murder of children via medical malpractice and malfeasance!
There was a pre-print of a scientific publication that was going to be published before the FDA session and the editor (Elsevier) was contacted by Pfizer to block the article because it was going to affect the deliberation.
That's what you call "Believe in Science". It's politics, it has nothing to do with Science.
That's quite a leap from the statement you quote and saying he "knew it was unsafe." You would not find much success as a prosecutor.
Thank you for covering Ms. Dressen's story. I think it's important for our critics to remember that a great number of vaccine skeptics began our journey as vaccine true believers. It isn't conspiracy theories, or dark rabbit holes, that led us into this camp. It is personal experience and, in Dressen's case, a great deal of courage. The same qualities that led her to enroll in a clinical trial are clearly shining here: a true, unselfish devotion to helping others. No surprise that she's a preschool teacher.
I had a Tdap vaccine 3 years ago, (wanting just tetanus but pharmacy said they didn’t have it) and developed severe noise sensitivity and tinnitus post vaccine as well. I also developed Hypnic Jerks, twitches and Hashimotos. It’s unfathomable how the governments expect everyone to line up for this experiment. I can’t imagine what it would do to me seeing how I’ve suffered from one that’s been tested and approved. I feel so bad for the people that are injured and going through such gaslighting.
Jennifer, I am so sorry to hear that. It sounds like you developed what used to be called St. Vitus's Dance, a long known reaction to vaccines. Aluminum is the adjuvant in the tdap vaccine. It is one of the most highly toxic substances to living things. But the CDC insists its safe to injuect, based on no evidence whatsoever.
https://www.skyhorsepublishing.com/9781510762534/imagine-you-are-an-aluminum-atom/
I can highly recommend the work of Dr. Suzanne Humphries, who began to research vaccines only after administering thousands of them. She wrote Dissolving Illusions, which should be read by anyone before agreeing to a vaccine. https://dissolvingillusions.com/
Thank you, Cici. I read about St. Vitus, it wasn’t as bad as that. And I knew it had to be the aluminum! I am much better now but it took months of research and various treatments. Supplements and sauna helped the most. It cost me so much money and time. I never heard of that book and will be adding it to my library, thank you.
This article is incredibly important and chilling for two reasons: 1) It shows how a person obviously injured by a vaccine was ignored by public health officials and 2) Because it shows that the “watchdog press” is actively suppressing such stories and seems to be under orders to censor revelations that could challenge myriad elements of the authorized COVID narrative.
Like this author, I am a “freelance” journalist who has written many COVID stories the mainstream press won’t cover. But writing “contrarian” stories is just half the battle. Once you’ve written a piece that “challenges the narrative,” you also have to find some news organization (preferably with a large audience) that will publish the story. As I have learned, good luck with this part of the project.
Linked below is a piece I wrote that documents how the mainstream press ignored what I thought was a “Page-1” blockbuster story. This story happened to be about people who almost certainly had COVID months before the virus was supposed to be “spreading” in America. People can agree with this theory or not. The point I would like to make with this post is that NO mainstream media journalists are willing to seriously investigate this possibility. It’s a taboo subject, something I have learned from my own email exchanges with reporters at well-known news organizations (like the Wall Street Journal).
Speaking for myself, I don’t know how any established narratives are ever going change if no accepted press organization is ever going to challenge these narratives.
What Ms. Bonvie’s excellent article tells me is that we need some “whistle blowers” in journalism who are brave enough to come forward and confirm that dissenting articles are indeed being spiked.
Anyone at this site is welcome to contact me if they want more details of my own experiences about reporters who are unwilling to write certain COVID stories. My email is: wjricejunior@gmail.com.
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/07/13/covid-19-is-a-real-search-for-the-truth-now-taboo/
Thank you for pursing this story. No, no mainstream news outlet will publish these stories, so journalists like yourself and others who have left mainstream (like Sharyl Attkisson and Alex Berenson) are doing this work independently.
Have you heard of the "Trusted News Initiative"? It is a consortium of mainstream news outlets wedded to narrative that Vaccines Can Do No Harm. This, despite the fact that the US Supreme Court ruled that vaccines were "unavoidably unsafe."
https://www.bbc.com/beyondfakenews/trusted-news-initiative/
https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/covid-19-the-shadowy-trusted-news-initiative/
You sound like someone who is just waking up to how controlled mainstream news has been for a very long time. This is an outstanding resource to understand what's been going on since before you were born:
https://www.wanttoknow.info/mediainformation
The independent journalist George Webb also discovered what you did. I find his videos a bit hard to follow, but he has put his news stories into short books
https://twitter.com/RealGeorgeWebb1
and has recently started a substack:
https://substack.com/profile/60060898-george-webb
We have to be the real media, people like you,
Corey Lynn: https://www.coreysdigs.com/health-science/pfizer-fda-corruption-lethal-batches-and-autopsies-reveal-covid-19-jab-genocide/
Whitney Webb: https://twitter.com/_whitneywebb/status/1483867351363772416?cxt=HHwWgICzvdDf4JcpAAAA
The many fine writers at The Defender (eg https://twitter.com/PamLongCO)
Sharyl Attkisson has written about how her stories were spiked but this was long before covid.
Unfortunately a lot of people (most people) won't wake up until they or someone they know has a bad reaction to the jab. But good journalists who care can create a healthy media alternative, so that when a msm journo is ready to blow the whistle, they have somewhere to go.
Thanks for the tips. I agree it will take people going around or outside of the "gatekeepers of the news" to get the truth to large numbers of people. I posted this because I don't think many people realize all the important journalism that is being blocked by editors who are not interested in pursuing real investigations of important topics. Note that I never say that news organizations have to agree with my conclusions. My gripe is that these "investigative" news organizations won't even authorize any investigations to look into these possibilities.
So the Wall Street Journal rejected your submission? You are aware are you not that the Wall Street Journal has the same ownership as Fox News? Are they in on it too? They will probably be surprised to hear that they are part of some massive left-wing conspiracy.
I have shared many emails with a reporter at the Wall Street Journal who said she was interested in investigating early spread. She actually interviewed Brandie McCain, one of the subjects of my reporting and told me the interview went great. I mailed this reporter copies of Tim McCain's medical records. I was led to believe a story might be coming and this never happened - just like the lady in this article was interviewed by the New York Times, but no story ever appeared. About 25 news organizations did reject my "early spread" story, but I don't think I submitted it to the Wall Street Journal. I only submitted it to publications that run freelance articles. Reporters at the paper have read the article that was finally published. Trust me. The Wall Street Journal's reporters also know what COVID stories they can't run. But so do reporters at EVERY mainstream media news organization. That's the story.
I'm no expert but I would expect that the WSJ gets lots of submissions and rejects most of them. That is not evidence of some kind of conspiracy. Perhaps you should submit your paper here. They are likely to have a harder time finding content and it sounds like what you want to write about would fit with their mission, whatever that is. Probably that they see the money Fox makes at stoking division and conspiracy, and they want a piece of the action.
I'm not talking about publications that reject freelance submissions. I'm talking about a newsroom full of reporters who will not investigate legitimate news tips. Here's a quote from original post: "The point I would like to make with this post is that NO mainstream media journalists are willing to seriously investigate this possibility. It’s a taboo subject, something I have learned from my own email exchanges with reporters at well-known news organizations (like the Wall Street Journal)."
I'm not whining because the WSJ didn't 't run my story. I'm concerned that the WSJ has no reporter who is willing to seriously investigate what I am trying to seriously investigate ..... Just like the NY Times has no reporters who will seriously investigate vaccine injuries. You can read my story that one alternative media finally did publish and tell me why every other publication I submitted it to, did not run it. Nobody even asked me any questions or to see any of my evidence .... except for an editor at one site. And this editor and site have now been banned by Twitter.
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/06/25/an-alabama-man-nearly-died-from-covid-19-the-first-week-in-january/
Look, I know it must be tough to try to get by as a freelance writer, but I think it's a leap to think your work was rejected because of some kind of conspiracy. I mostly read the mainstream media and I recall articles speculating about earlier instances of Covid. I think it's more likely that the WSJ rejected your article because it was a subject that had already been covered and the weight of the evidence did not support your conclusion.
So you think the mainstream journalists have looked into "early spread" and rejected it because there was no supporting evidence? If you find any links to these articles - showing that reporters looked into this evidence - please share with me. I'd like to read them. As you will see if you read my main stories on the McCains, the Seattle Times and Palm Beach Post did run questioning stories early on .... and later dropped this line of inquiry. For example, I sent reporters at these papers info on the McCain's cases and they had no interest in following up or reporting my findings. My article actually supported articles their reporters had reported, which said the same thing. Why did they suddenly drop this area of investigation? They didn't believe their own reporting. Their own stories contained no good reasons to doubt the people making these claims. That is, there is no strong evidence that debunks these claims. In fact, there is copious evidence that supports these claims.
It's my understanding there are seven other reporting systems. VAERS is extremely flawed and at one point a whistleblower said she had proof the CDC was covering up more than 250k more. The system did not have very many options. When u went on there, people contacted CDC directly to report often if serious bcuz it didn't offer that option when reporting. If they did that, some found that their description of what they suffered and the VAERS description of what they suffered was two different accts.
On a positive note, Dr. Mary Bowden, a private-practice otolaryngologist who promoted ivermectin as a viable COVID-19 treatment in 2020 and was subsequently suspended from Houston Methodist Hospital is suing the hospital - details are here: https://www.theblaze.com/news/doctor-suspended-for-promoting-ivermectin-sues-houston-methodist-hospital-covid-data-financial-reports?utm_source=theblaze-dailyAM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__AM%202022-01-20&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20AM
This is great news and I hope she is successful. This type of action is needed against any hospital or health system that refused to administer Ivermectin as prescribed by a practicing physician. I hope she able to fully expose the unholy alliance between big pharma, our health agencies, hospitals, hospital systems, the media, much of academia, medical journals, etc. One problem, however, will be that because most of the MSM is complicit, getting through and accurate coverage will likely be problematic.
Hurray, thank you for posting that, Barnes. I think there will be many more like her to come. Stew Peters has done a good job of getting the word out, and as I said to Bill Rice (above), we have to become the real media, at Substack, at our own websites, at smaller outlets that will grow, because msm is collapsing.
https://rumble.com/c/StewPeters
Glad I chose NO VAXX. I did not trust the pharmaceuticals, period. Treatment if you can find someone who is willing?
This fantastic video describes the numerous problems with Pfizer's clinical trials and the unconscionable deception on many levels. The FDA went along with it.
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/the-pfizer-inoculations-for-covid-19-more-harm-than-good-2/
Anyone interested can go to VAERSAnalysis.info which compares Adverse Effects from Covid vaccines to all other vaccines combined since 1990. That this data is ignored or downplayed is in itself a sign of corruption. For example, for all other vaccines combined, there have been 9461 reported deaths following vaccination since 1990. For covid, there have been 21,745 reported deaths after vaccination since December 2020, yet we are told there is nothing to see here, move along. That site provides a wealth of data. And yes, it should be 1/7/22, not 21.
Where is the published safety study of these so called vaccines?
There hasn't been any meaningful release of data and the BMJ have been calling for a public release of the data for some time now.
https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o102
Brianne may wish to take her story to the BMJ, as they have been far more receptive to other viewpoints compared to most medical journals. They recently covered the corruption within the Pfizer trials and I've not seen any other organisation do this (besides Project Veritas who brought the original story to light):
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
And side effects, guaranteed????