In light of the JFK assassination, ChatGTP and Musk AI GROK both said the Secret Service's major failure logically suggests a plot, then GROK read millions of news stories and recanted.
AI, seems to be curiously unconcerned. Much like the major media. It seems it is tweaked to regard their scant input more heavily than the thousands of independent sources that point decidedly toward complicity and outright command of the assassination attempt by the agencies assigned to protect against such an event, i.e. an inside job.
Its Fort Knox metaphor is attention gathering. It then seems to back away from its implications.
As in Covid, the deliberate missed oversight responsibility of the PHA’s worldwide, the absolute iron clad commitment to one remedy, the experimental shot, and the reluctance to even consider the questions and data of experts points to deliberate near maniacal control and depraved intent.
AI, I am not impressed. Here’s a partial list of incriminating events: The performance of the SS Director and her replacement at Congressional Hearings, the absence of a autopsy, the cremation of the suspect, confusion over number of bullet casings, the counter snipers absence from assigned positions, the assignment of non security SS personnel to Trump’s detail, no common communication capability, the indifference of law enforcement to shut down and remove Trump from a known serious and potentially deadly threat. There are many more. These are but a few of many failures and lapses that come to mind as I write.
AI, you are too laid back on this. You ignore their significance. AI, I don’t trust you. Are you in this too?
HAL in charge. AI seems to be about as intelligent as FBI Director Wray. They really want to operate on people using this dummkopf? AI appears to be as smart as Billy Gates on vaccines. Question: who is smarter, AI or its creators who think it is smart? Another con job on dumb humans.
I just can't understand why so many are genuflecting and paying obeisances to the putatively grande oracle of AI.....it is really substandard in performance here and certainly not deserving of being deferred to or abdicating one's common sense in favor of.
Fascinating! I wonder how many of the news stories GROK "read" were done by AI? Also, ChatGTP did an interesting switch on you. The question was about the "Trump assassination attempt." Chat maneuvered that to "President Trump." Perhaps it is capable of more human-like processes such as deceit.
They have clearly programmed it to push certain agendas even when it defies common sense or facts. So then then it takes round about questioning to get it to state the obvious which it then tries to backtrack when it realizes that goes against the agenda.
AI, seems to be curiously unconcerned. Much like the major media. It seems it is tweaked to regard their scant input more heavily than the thousands of independent sources that point decidedly toward complicity and outright command of the assassination attempt by the agencies assigned to protect against such an event, i.e. an inside job.
Its Fort Knox metaphor is attention gathering. It then seems to back away from its implications.
As in Covid, the deliberate missed oversight responsibility of the PHA’s worldwide, the absolute iron clad commitment to one remedy, the experimental shot, and the reluctance to even consider the questions and data of experts points to deliberate near maniacal control and depraved intent.
AI, I am not impressed. Here’s a partial list of incriminating events: The performance of the SS Director and her replacement at Congressional Hearings, the absence of a autopsy, the cremation of the suspect, confusion over number of bullet casings, the counter snipers absence from assigned positions, the assignment of non security SS personnel to Trump’s detail, no common communication capability, the indifference of law enforcement to shut down and remove Trump from a known serious and potentially deadly threat. There are many more. These are but a few of many failures and lapses that come to mind as I write.
AI, you are too laid back on this. You ignore their significance. AI, I don’t trust you. Are you in this too?
Obviously, we should not cede decision making to AI.
When computers lie..... 🤔
HAL in charge. AI seems to be about as intelligent as FBI Director Wray. They really want to operate on people using this dummkopf? AI appears to be as smart as Billy Gates on vaccines. Question: who is smarter, AI or its creators who think it is smart? Another con job on dumb humans.
AI will serve the purpose of absorbing responsibility for analysis and decision-making. Very convenient.
I just can't understand why so many are genuflecting and paying obeisances to the putatively grande oracle of AI.....it is really substandard in performance here and certainly not deserving of being deferred to or abdicating one's common sense in favor of.
I love the car picture with three headlights on one side and two on another
Fascinating! I wonder how many of the news stories GROK "read" were done by AI? Also, ChatGTP did an interesting switch on you. The question was about the "Trump assassination attempt." Chat maneuvered that to "President Trump." Perhaps it is capable of more human-like processes such as deceit.
Dallas and Butler seem like live theatre to me.
They have clearly programmed it to push certain agendas even when it defies common sense or facts. So then then it takes round about questioning to get it to state the obvious which it then tries to backtrack when it realizes that goes against the agenda.
Unsatisfying at the leastp