The Cancer Industry has been operating in ITS best interests and NOT the best interests of patients for decades. There are too many reports of Oncologists prescribing chemo treatments based on which has the highest price and greatest profit margin instead of what is most likely to help the patient, which is why they will HATE this study! They want to sell an $80,000 to $250,000 treatment protocol, not a $500 one.
And cancer research is mostly still "barking up the wrong tree" of things like targeted genetic treatments, which is an impossible dead-end with one tumor possibly containing thousands of genetic mutations. Cancer IS NOT A GENETIC DISEASE!!!! It is a METABOLIC disease, primarily of damaged, faulty mitochondria and cellular energy production. People need to get their bodies and immune systems HEALTHIER, NOT to POISON them! The entire current premise is completely wrong. Targeting cancer cells with repurposed drugs such as Ivermectin and Fenbendazole, that often work metabolically in numerous ways, such as triggering apoptosis, and "throwing the kitchen sink" at it with such things as medicinal mushrooms, herbs, paw paw, turmeric, mistletoe, berberine, quercetin, CoQ10, melatonin, and supplements to support the immune system such as HIGH DOSE vitamins C and D, selenium, iodine, zinc, etc., probably give the patient the best chance.
HOWEVER . . . the power of the human mind MUST be factored in and optimized. I am of the opinion that all the drugs and supplements in the world will ultimately be useless without the right mindset and willingness to work on the non-chemical or "non-physical" aspects also. This encompasses attitudes and beliefs, KNOWING that cancer can be healed and giving THAT message to the subconscious mind. Somehow, attitude has a huge impact on immune function. It is the "Placebo Effect" IN ACTION, and it is POWERFUL, bringing about dramatic PHYSIOLOGICAL changes. Visualization techniques that imagine the tumors going away send a strong messase to the subconscious that can affect hormones and the immune system in helpful ways. Also, energetic healing methods somehow affect the function of cells and the immune system. This has even been demonstrated with plants and microbial cultures. It can be harnessed to augment whatever else is being done: Reiki, Qi Gung, acupuncture/acupressure, "hands on" healing techniques such as channelling healing energy through the the palm chakras, etc. can be powerful support for healing.
Like I said — "throw the kitchen sink at it"! If the methods are harmless (or in the case of repurposed pharmaceuticals, nearly so), why not hit the cancer from every possible direction? If I were diagnosed, I would!
I think it is outstanding that FLCCC has pivoted to studying cancer - one of the top killers today. This is a key reason I continue to support this organization.
"After ten rounds of radiation and six of chemotherapy........"
The ivermectin would have done its job quicker if he had not received these slash and burn medico treatments. But without getting this medico abuse he never would have "believed" and tried ivermectin. One of the contradictions of life. Ivermectin and Fenbendazole too. These powerful dewormers don't just clean up your intestines to where worms-parasites get killed and expelled. They also clean up/detoxify your liver/gall bladder. Ever since Max Gerson cured cancer with carrot juice and coffee enemas. It has been known that in order to cure cancer, you must cure your liver/gall bladder.
Guess what. There are well known herbal dewormers. They also detoxify -- clean up the liver gall bladder. But Ivermectin and Fenbendazole are stronger. If I had cancer I would also do coffee enemas 4x per week and start my day by juicing an entire bunch of celery. Juice a piece of ginger as big as your thumb with it. Even larger ginger as you get used to it.
I do believe the incompetent people and organizations such as the FDA and CDC are in a panic over the situation. Their jubilation over convincing most people that ivermectin was a horse medicine exposed them as the the scientific buffoons that they are. After having it explained to them what ivermectin is and how large is the number of lives saved by it and that the discoverer received the Nibel Prize for their work, they are now in a panic and scrambling to initiate investigations into the how many other simple medications could be effectively treated by them. But the rapid evidence that will emerge only makes them appear that much the more foolish. In the past week I saw a paper exposing the evidence that in a population of over one million people taking a baby aspirin the cancer rate is reduced by about twenty five percent. There is already a mountain of evidence like this sitting out there which they have point blank refused to study because it was would harm the cash flow they receive from their friends which they fund with taxpayer money, exclusively. Cancer is fundamentally a metabolic disease. This was discovered in the 1930s by a generation of brilliant German biochemists but those controlling our research funds have steadfastly refused to fund the essential research to find treatment and cures. Now they panic to try save their sorry asses. I also saw last week that patient zero in a hurried trial to determine the effectiveness of ivermectin on cancer is already indicating optimism. Patient zero, a man with multiple rounds of radiation and chemo and at stage four, a death sentence, had gone into remission following two weeks of a daily dose of ivermectin. And we do know the biochemistry that could explain this, some of us know that is. Others will never know due to personal financial barriers to their understanding of many things.
Remembering Mac Planck's comment when once asked why science advances so slowly, "one funeral at a time". Perhaps we have had enough funerals so we can now admit that cancer is a metabolic disease as the brilliant German biochemists discovered in the 1930s before they were exterminated in the gas chambers. The obsession with genetics was analogous to the belief that wet pavement causes it to rain. However there is an genetic component but it's in the once supposed garbage part of the genome because it's epigenetic and so is a variable both responding to and also creating a metabolic response.
I believe Paul Mann's life is in danger. Not as much from stage 4 cancer, as from Big Pharma, who might lose the whole chemo-industry because of Ivermectin. Protect him well! Share the story far and wide! Get hold of Ivermectin, my friends!
It's not astonishing that ivermectin works so well for so much ...... toxins and parasites / viruses are the source of all diseases said Dr. Hulda Clark with a lifetime of research and case studies ........... and I'm sure there are many many other doctors who found similar things and were censured harrassed heavily................ just follow everything medical that is censured and be prepared to be amazed and very happy. :)
Here's just a few more things besides ivermectin ....... 1. ************************************************
page 245-246 of Dr. Michael Holick's (a 40 year researcher on vitamin D) published in his 2010 book, "The Vitamin D Solution" ...................... "For some, even physicians, it's incomprehensible that vitamin D can reduce the risk of heart attack by as much as 50 percent; reduce the risk of common cancers of the colon, prostate, and breast by as much as 50 percent; reduce the risk of infections [typo in book? infectious?) diseases, including influenza, by as much as 90 percent; reduce the risk of type 1 diabetes by 78 percent in a child who gets 2000 IU of vitamin D a day in the first year of life; decrease the risk of type 2 diabetes; decrease the risk of dementia and depression; wipe out cases of fibromyalgia that have been misdiagnosed; and dramatically decrease the risk of multiple sclerosis and other auto-immune diseases. When in doubt, I always go back to this simple fact; every tissue and cell in the body has a vitamin D receptor." end of excerpt from page 245-246 of Dr. Michael Holick's book "The Vitamin D Solution".
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, April 22, 2005
Vitamin C Saves Lives
Millions die each year from heart disease and stroke, and the overwhelming evidence is that vitamin C supplementation would save many lives.
Two-time Nobel Prize winner Dr. Linus Pauling estimated that the rate of heart disease would be reduced by 80 per cent if adults in the US supplemented with 2,000 to 3,000 mg of vitamin C each day. According to Dr. Pauling, "Since vitamin C deficiency is the common cause of human heart disease, vitamin C supplementation is the universal treatment for this disease."[1] Heart disease is the number one killer in the US. For those with existing heart disease Dr. Pauling said that blockage of heart arteries could actually be reversed by supplementing with 6,000 of vitamin C and 6,000 of lysine (a common amino acid) taken in divided doses throughout the day. Vitamin C supplementation both lowers serum cholesterol levels and repairs lesions of arterial walls. 1998 Nobel Prize winner Dr. Louis J. Ignarro found that supplementing with vitamin C and vitamin E significantly reduces the risk of developing arteriosclerosis.[2]
A study examined vitamin E and vitamin C supplement use in relation to mortality risk in 11,178 persons aged 67-105 who participated in the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly over a nine year period.[3] Simultaneous use of vitamins E and C was associated with a lower risk of total mortality and coronary mortality after adjusting for alcohol use, smoking history, aspirin use, and medical conditions.
A landmark study following over 85,000 nurses over a 16-year period for a total of 1,240,000 person-years found that vitamin C supplementation significantly reduced the risk of heart disease.[4] Intake of vitamin C from foods alone was insufficient to significantly effect the rate of heart disease. High quantities of vitamin C from supplements was essential to provide the protective effects. The study adjusted for age, smoking, and a variety of other coronary risk factors."
In this particular case, a detailed list of what the patient did & did not do in terms of lifestyle would be useful.
I have no doubt that when conventional doctors claim a case of "spontaneous remission", the patients took responsibility for their illness & made major changes in the lifestyle, especially diet. Unfortunately the mainstream medical community for decades & because of educational indoctrination & the influence of the pharmaceutical industry will not believe that something as basic as nutrition can have a profound effect on illness.
The late Dr Nicholas Gonzalez MD was probably the major figure who used targeted nutrition to heal those who came to see him. The posthumously published case studies in Conquering Cancer Volumes 1 & 2, are without a doubt, profoundly important in showing the world that so called "alternative" approaches to cancer can be far more effective than conventional treatments.
If anyone really wants to know what cancer is, the answer to it is in embryology. Cancer is trophoblastic.
I’ve been following Dr. William Makis’s Substack & research on both Iver & FenBen. He’s also got a wealth of knowledge. Along with the 2nd Smartest Guy in the World and Fenbendazole Can Cure Cancer. All worth reading & following.
Ivermectin interferes with irregular cells, parasites, spike proteins, cancer. Makes perfect sense.
The Cancer Industry has been operating in ITS best interests and NOT the best interests of patients for decades. There are too many reports of Oncologists prescribing chemo treatments based on which has the highest price and greatest profit margin instead of what is most likely to help the patient, which is why they will HATE this study! They want to sell an $80,000 to $250,000 treatment protocol, not a $500 one.
And cancer research is mostly still "barking up the wrong tree" of things like targeted genetic treatments, which is an impossible dead-end with one tumor possibly containing thousands of genetic mutations. Cancer IS NOT A GENETIC DISEASE!!!! It is a METABOLIC disease, primarily of damaged, faulty mitochondria and cellular energy production. People need to get their bodies and immune systems HEALTHIER, NOT to POISON them! The entire current premise is completely wrong. Targeting cancer cells with repurposed drugs such as Ivermectin and Fenbendazole, that often work metabolically in numerous ways, such as triggering apoptosis, and "throwing the kitchen sink" at it with such things as medicinal mushrooms, herbs, paw paw, turmeric, mistletoe, berberine, quercetin, CoQ10, melatonin, and supplements to support the immune system such as HIGH DOSE vitamins C and D, selenium, iodine, zinc, etc., probably give the patient the best chance.
HOWEVER . . . the power of the human mind MUST be factored in and optimized. I am of the opinion that all the drugs and supplements in the world will ultimately be useless without the right mindset and willingness to work on the non-chemical or "non-physical" aspects also. This encompasses attitudes and beliefs, KNOWING that cancer can be healed and giving THAT message to the subconscious mind. Somehow, attitude has a huge impact on immune function. It is the "Placebo Effect" IN ACTION, and it is POWERFUL, bringing about dramatic PHYSIOLOGICAL changes. Visualization techniques that imagine the tumors going away send a strong messase to the subconscious that can affect hormones and the immune system in helpful ways. Also, energetic healing methods somehow affect the function of cells and the immune system. This has even been demonstrated with plants and microbial cultures. It can be harnessed to augment whatever else is being done: Reiki, Qi Gung, acupuncture/acupressure, "hands on" healing techniques such as channelling healing energy through the the palm chakras, etc. can be powerful support for healing.
Like I said — "throw the kitchen sink at it"! If the methods are harmless (or in the case of repurposed pharmaceuticals, nearly so), why not hit the cancer from every possible direction? If I were diagnosed, I would!
I think it is outstanding that FLCCC has pivoted to studying cancer - one of the top killers today. This is a key reason I continue to support this organization.
God speed to all. Such important work!
Mary Beth , I am happy that you writing again.
Wonderful report.
I've just been told I have a lung lesion... What the hell, what's the worse that could happen? I worm myself? LOL...
"After ten rounds of radiation and six of chemotherapy........"
The ivermectin would have done its job quicker if he had not received these slash and burn medico treatments. But without getting this medico abuse he never would have "believed" and tried ivermectin. One of the contradictions of life. Ivermectin and Fenbendazole too. These powerful dewormers don't just clean up your intestines to where worms-parasites get killed and expelled. They also clean up/detoxify your liver/gall bladder. Ever since Max Gerson cured cancer with carrot juice and coffee enemas. It has been known that in order to cure cancer, you must cure your liver/gall bladder.
Guess what. There are well known herbal dewormers. They also detoxify -- clean up the liver gall bladder. But Ivermectin and Fenbendazole are stronger. If I had cancer I would also do coffee enemas 4x per week and start my day by juicing an entire bunch of celery. Juice a piece of ginger as big as your thumb with it. Even larger ginger as you get used to it.
I do believe the incompetent people and organizations such as the FDA and CDC are in a panic over the situation. Their jubilation over convincing most people that ivermectin was a horse medicine exposed them as the the scientific buffoons that they are. After having it explained to them what ivermectin is and how large is the number of lives saved by it and that the discoverer received the Nibel Prize for their work, they are now in a panic and scrambling to initiate investigations into the how many other simple medications could be effectively treated by them. But the rapid evidence that will emerge only makes them appear that much the more foolish. In the past week I saw a paper exposing the evidence that in a population of over one million people taking a baby aspirin the cancer rate is reduced by about twenty five percent. There is already a mountain of evidence like this sitting out there which they have point blank refused to study because it was would harm the cash flow they receive from their friends which they fund with taxpayer money, exclusively. Cancer is fundamentally a metabolic disease. This was discovered in the 1930s by a generation of brilliant German biochemists but those controlling our research funds have steadfastly refused to fund the essential research to find treatment and cures. Now they panic to try save their sorry asses. I also saw last week that patient zero in a hurried trial to determine the effectiveness of ivermectin on cancer is already indicating optimism. Patient zero, a man with multiple rounds of radiation and chemo and at stage four, a death sentence, had gone into remission following two weeks of a daily dose of ivermectin. And we do know the biochemistry that could explain this, some of us know that is. Others will never know due to personal financial barriers to their understanding of many things.
.
Remembering Mac Planck's comment when once asked why science advances so slowly, "one funeral at a time". Perhaps we have had enough funerals so we can now admit that cancer is a metabolic disease as the brilliant German biochemists discovered in the 1930s before they were exterminated in the gas chambers. The obsession with genetics was analogous to the belief that wet pavement causes it to rain. However there is an genetic component but it's in the once supposed garbage part of the genome because it's epigenetic and so is a variable both responding to and also creating a metabolic response.
Does anyone know if individuals can sign up or who they can contact if they are interested in participating in this research?
I believe Paul Mann's life is in danger. Not as much from stage 4 cancer, as from Big Pharma, who might lose the whole chemo-industry because of Ivermectin. Protect him well! Share the story far and wide! Get hold of Ivermectin, my friends!
It's not astonishing that ivermectin works so well for so much ...... toxins and parasites / viruses are the source of all diseases said Dr. Hulda Clark with a lifetime of research and case studies ........... and I'm sure there are many many other doctors who found similar things and were censured harrassed heavily................ just follow everything medical that is censured and be prepared to be amazed and very happy. :)
Here's just a few more things besides ivermectin ....... 1. ************************************************
page 245-246 of Dr. Michael Holick's (a 40 year researcher on vitamin D) published in his 2010 book, "The Vitamin D Solution" ...................... "For some, even physicians, it's incomprehensible that vitamin D can reduce the risk of heart attack by as much as 50 percent; reduce the risk of common cancers of the colon, prostate, and breast by as much as 50 percent; reduce the risk of infections [typo in book? infectious?) diseases, including influenza, by as much as 90 percent; reduce the risk of type 1 diabetes by 78 percent in a child who gets 2000 IU of vitamin D a day in the first year of life; decrease the risk of type 2 diabetes; decrease the risk of dementia and depression; wipe out cases of fibromyalgia that have been misdiagnosed; and dramatically decrease the risk of multiple sclerosis and other auto-immune diseases. When in doubt, I always go back to this simple fact; every tissue and cell in the body has a vitamin D receptor." end of excerpt from page 245-246 of Dr. Michael Holick's book "The Vitamin D Solution".
2. ********************************************************
http://www.orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v01n02.shtml
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, April 22, 2005
Vitamin C Saves Lives
Millions die each year from heart disease and stroke, and the overwhelming evidence is that vitamin C supplementation would save many lives.
Two-time Nobel Prize winner Dr. Linus Pauling estimated that the rate of heart disease would be reduced by 80 per cent if adults in the US supplemented with 2,000 to 3,000 mg of vitamin C each day. According to Dr. Pauling, "Since vitamin C deficiency is the common cause of human heart disease, vitamin C supplementation is the universal treatment for this disease."[1] Heart disease is the number one killer in the US. For those with existing heart disease Dr. Pauling said that blockage of heart arteries could actually be reversed by supplementing with 6,000 of vitamin C and 6,000 of lysine (a common amino acid) taken in divided doses throughout the day. Vitamin C supplementation both lowers serum cholesterol levels and repairs lesions of arterial walls. 1998 Nobel Prize winner Dr. Louis J. Ignarro found that supplementing with vitamin C and vitamin E significantly reduces the risk of developing arteriosclerosis.[2]
A study examined vitamin E and vitamin C supplement use in relation to mortality risk in 11,178 persons aged 67-105 who participated in the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly over a nine year period.[3] Simultaneous use of vitamins E and C was associated with a lower risk of total mortality and coronary mortality after adjusting for alcohol use, smoking history, aspirin use, and medical conditions.
A landmark study following over 85,000 nurses over a 16-year period for a total of 1,240,000 person-years found that vitamin C supplementation significantly reduced the risk of heart disease.[4] Intake of vitamin C from foods alone was insufficient to significantly effect the rate of heart disease. High quantities of vitamin C from supplements was essential to provide the protective effects. The study adjusted for age, smoking, and a variety of other coronary risk factors."
Good luck with the study.
In this particular case, a detailed list of what the patient did & did not do in terms of lifestyle would be useful.
I have no doubt that when conventional doctors claim a case of "spontaneous remission", the patients took responsibility for their illness & made major changes in the lifestyle, especially diet. Unfortunately the mainstream medical community for decades & because of educational indoctrination & the influence of the pharmaceutical industry will not believe that something as basic as nutrition can have a profound effect on illness.
The late Dr Nicholas Gonzalez MD was probably the major figure who used targeted nutrition to heal those who came to see him. The posthumously published case studies in Conquering Cancer Volumes 1 & 2, are without a doubt, profoundly important in showing the world that so called "alternative" approaches to cancer can be far more effective than conventional treatments.
If anyone really wants to know what cancer is, the answer to it is in embryology. Cancer is trophoblastic.
I’ve been following Dr. William Makis’s Substack & research on both Iver & FenBen. He’s also got a wealth of knowledge. Along with the 2nd Smartest Guy in the World and Fenbendazole Can Cure Cancer. All worth reading & following.
You guys are heroes. May God continue to bless you.