Dr. Pierre Kory gives a clinic on big pharma's capture of mainstream media, big tech, medical journals, and governments. "They don't care if people die."
Thank you so much for writing about this horrific situation. We need physicians like those on the FLCCC AND mainstream media professionals, such as yourself, (who've been prohibited from publishing in well respected and recognized newspapers), who will do whatever it takes to write the truth - even if it means starting your own platform , RESCUE. Thank you Michael Capuzzo.
There's a simple reason "well respected and recognized newspapers" won't publish any of this miracle horseshit.... they are "well respected and recognized" indeed. No serious media outlet would ever publish such quackery. You guys only exist in the deepest corner of the internet and you basically preaching mostly to yourselves like a brain-washed cult. Have you actually looked at the FLCCC site recently? It's classic "Infomercial" style misleading propaganda, repeating the same "miracle & evidence" horseshit over and over again. And it's getting worse every week. I guess Kory and his clan of crooks are getting desperate. Serious doctors have long left this criminal enterprise.... what's left is the shameless scum, trying to make a buck of the gullible. What a despicable group of scum bags....
TRUTH? You don't even know the meaning of that word. Otherwise you wouldn't hang out here. The only "horrific situation" here is that scumbags like these "online doctors" are allowed to spread their garbage for profit without ever to worry about getting criminally prosecuted. A silver lining is that these criminals are bound to substack and other unknown sub-standard sites. Thank God!
Please stop getting RESCUE Jim. We don't need your disinformation here. The reality is that ivermectin is recommended in 37 countries around the world which means that 28% of the global population is using ivermectin and preventing hospitalization and death. It's not our job to convince you. Stick with the captured mainstream media and public health agencies but please stay well. No one needs to die from Covid any longer.
Please stop telling me what to read and what to comment on. It's your IVM "Miracle cult" who's spreading misinformation. That's a fact. And your "it's recommended in 37 countries" is just another pile of horse shit. There is not a single reputable medical organization in any of these countries who "recommend" IVM as Covid treatment. Just because some doctors going "rogue" in 37 countries doesn't mean these countries support their quackery. But thank for pointing it out. It's the perfect example for how these FLCCC "online miracle doctors" twisting facts and falsifying data. Thanks again... you just made my day.
Jim - I won't go down this road with you again but I want to give you a chance to investigate on your own. Goggle Uttar Pradesh. Read about the caseload there in May/June- over 400,000 daily infections. ( google covid rates in Uttar Pradesh) Read about the home medicine kits that were distributed to every household in the region with the assistance of the WHO. The kits contained 12 mg. of ivermectin among other items. Goggle what their covid rates are today. It's all there for anyone to see. Their daily cases are less than 50 out of 230 Million people today. They essentially ended the pandemic - also goggle vaccination rates during that spring season - less than 5%. As mentioned, I have nothing else to offer you. Yes, it might be a bit threatening to google what I've suggested.......but give it a try....unless you're too scared to really check this out.
If you don't want to go down that road again... why are you doing it?
I know the Uttar Pradesh story very well... and it proves absolute nothing about efficacy of IVM. But It shows if people follow instructions of their local government health officials, wearing masks, strict isolation, rapid tests etc. that outbreaks can be tamed quickly. Don't even start another round of bullshit that IVM caused a "Uttar Pradesh Miracle"
You provided a link that supposedly fact checks this claim and deems it false: "The Indian of state Uttar Pradesh has been declared COVID-19 free after the government promoted the use of Ivermectin."
It deems it false by stating this:
"However, the use of ivermectin is extremely controversial, and the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Foods and Drugs Administration (FDA) have advised medical professionals not to prescribe it, adding that the drug could in fact lead to serious illness. Other countries, including the U.S., do not approve of using the anti-parasitic drug for COVID-19 in patients.
Merck, an Ivermectin manufacturer, has stated that preclinical studies show no "scientific basis" for the drug's effectiveness against COVID-19.
Active cases in Uttar Pradesh have declined, but the state is not entirely free of COVID-19. Furthermore, it is incorrect to infer that Ivermectin use played a role in reducing the number of COVID-19 cases in the state, as its use has not been fully approved by public health bodies.
The COVID-19 pandemic has given rise to a lot of potentially dangerous misinformation. For reliable advice on COVID-19, including symptoms, prevention, and available treatment, please refer to the World Health Organization or your national healthcare authority."
This is a joke of a fact check. Any drug, including Aspirin, can lead to serious illness. According to WHO's VigiAccess database, Ivermectin is safer than Aspirin.
Using Merck to fact check? LOL. This knee-slapping funny. Merck is developing a competitor to Ivermectin.
No, Uttar Pradesh is not completely Covid-free, but it's close to zero and only 6% of their population is vaccinated.
Not been fully approved by public health bodies? Which health bodies? How is it not fully approved? Not approved to take 100 mg per day? Even if it not fully approved, so what? It doesn't mean that Ivermectin wasn't a factor in lowering Covid in Uttar Pradesh.
Then this WHO shill, pretending to be a "fact checker", tells us to refer to WHO to get information. This is the WHO that said there is no human-to-human transmission two weeks after Taiwan told them that there is human-to-human transmission. This is the WHO that helped the cigarette industry by dragging its feet on the declaration that nicotine causes cancer. This is the WHO that declared Swine Flu as a pandemic to trigger vaccine sales.
How much is Big Pharma paying you to spread disinformation?
How many injections will it take to stay protected?
New England Journal Of Medicine
"CONCLUSIONS
"These findings indicate that immunity against the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 waned in all age groups a few months after receipt of the second dose of vaccine."
And getting the boosters can obviously increase potential side effects like this.
"COVID-19 Vaccine Associated Parkinson’s Disease, A Prion Disease Signal in the UK Yellow Card Adverse Event Database”
"Many have argued that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its mRNA sequence, found in all COVID-19 vaccines, are priongenic. The UK’s Yellow Card database of COVID-19 vaccine adverse event reports was evaluated for signals consistent with a pending epidemic of COVID vaccine induced prion disease."
International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
"Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19”
Abstract
"We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies."
Jim, you seem to have some good resources that don't show up mainstream. Do you have anything showing that natural immunity isn't as good as the vaccine?...thanks.
Well.... Sweden is the perfect example. Their "natural immunity" experiment failed miserably, which has cost them dearly in unnecessary deaths and misery.
Thanks for that but I was more interested in any studies comparing natural vs vaccine antibodies and immunity. Since I'm healthy and have had covid I'm thinking it doesn't make sense for me to get the vaccine, any comparison studies are appreciated.
BTW, I think the anger people have with differing opinions begins/ends with information being interpreted differently. You're giving credit to improved numbers in Sweden due to higher vaccination rates. Singapore has over 80% vaccinated, they wear masks and yet, they currently have their highest case rates ever.
My impression is that a lot of people incorrectly see correlation as causation with a lot of covid data...me, I can only be certain that I'm uncertain I know what's certain...
Well, again.... Sweden had exactly the same idea. They followed your exact train of thought. Become infected and develop your own strong immune response... Done. Apparently, it didn't work that way and they quickly started vaccinating people nationwide... even those who were previously infected.
Look... in the end it comes down to this: Why would you not take the shot? Even if you had Covid before... I took my Moderna Booster last Monday... switched from J&J 7 months ago. If you haven't gotten any shot yet... I'd take the 2 Moderna shots now, hands down. Why? Because you get the most "bang" for your immune system. Pfizer has only half the strength of the Moderna shot. Back in March... I had no choice. They all do their job... but Moderna simply gives you the highest antibody response.
The Singapore example shows that vaccines don't protect you from getting Covid. They never claimed they will 100% ..but they highly protect you from hospitalization and death. That's what the vaccine is -and always was- about. Another fact.. Singapore is were people live literally on top of each other.... basically a paradise for any virus. lol
It might be easier if you compare this to the Flu shot... you might still get the flu... but only mildly with no major complications.
Yeah, Sweden was a favorite target when their numbers were bad. Unfortunately, as I've been trying to tell you, too much data is really only the opinions of people afraid to leave their silo of information. I'm trying to get you outside your silo and even outdoors...I'm sure we agree that Vitamin D helps everyone to fight covid:
"Vaccinating people who have had covid-19: why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US?"
"Memoli highlights real world data such as the Cleveland Clinic study18 and points out that while “vaccines are focused on only that tiny portion of immunity that can be induced” by the spike, someone who has had covid-19 was exposed to the whole virus, “which would likely offer a broader based immunity” that would be more protective against variants. The laboratory study offered by the FDA22 “only has to do with very specific antibodies to a very specific region of the virus [the spike],” says Memoli. “Claiming this as data supporting that vaccines are better than natural immunity is shortsighted and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the complexity of immunity to respiratory viruses.”
"Jeffrey Klausner, a clinical professor of preventive medicine at the University of Southern California and former CDC medical officer, who has spoken out in favour of treating prior infection as equivalent to vaccination, with “the same societal status.”3 Klausner conducted a systematic review of 10 studies on reinfection and concluded that the “protective effect” of a previous infection “is high and similar to the protective effect of vaccination.”
"Logistics aside, a recognition of existing immunity would have fundamentally changed the target vaccination calculations and would also affect the calculations on boosters. “As we continued to put effort into vaccination and set targets, it became apparent to me that people were forgetting that herd immunity is formed by both natural immunity and vaccine immunity,” says Klausner."
"Gandhi thinks logistics is only part of the story. “There’s a very clear message out there that ‘OK, well natural infection does cause immunity but it’s still better to get vaccinated,’ and that message is not based on data,” says Gandhi. “There’s something political going on around that.”
“If natural immunity is strongly protective, as the evidence to date suggests it is, then vaccinating people who have had covid-19 would seem to offer nothing or very little to benefit, logically leaving only harms—both the harms we already know about as well as those still unknown,” says Christine Stabell Benn, vaccinologist and professor in global health at the University of Southern Denmark. The CDC has acknowledged the small but serious risks of heart inflammation and blood clots after vaccination, especially in younger people. The real risk in vaccinating people who have had covid-19 “is of doing more harm than good,” she says."
Who are the fact checkers and who are paying them?
It is your choice to take the vaccine. It is my choice to take IVM when diagnosed.
Are you going to tell this MD that his patients who he treated with IVM didn't get better?
"In Cushing, Oklahoma (pop. 7,826), Dr. Randy Grellner saw Kory’s testimony and started giving his patients Ivermectin, which he’d used safely for years for parasites, for COVID-19 because he was “tired of the heartache...tired of the misery...I’ve seen enough death and despair.” In a few weeks the overwhelmed clinic dropped from twenty-five new COVID-19 cases a day to two. “The first thing that surprised me was how fast was the recovery in seventy- five and eight-five-year-old people,” Dr. Grellner said. “I know there’s controversy. I have no political motivation. I don’t have any desire except to put husbands and wives back together. If you’re getting problems from an organization that you work for that says you can’t use it, I would question that organization. If we’re not doing what is best for the patient, then we need to find another occupation.”
You don't have an argument and your name calling and ad hominem attacks are just that, and nothing more.
Moderna has minted three new billionaires including Bancel, "Former employees further charged that Bancel was actually “running an investment firm” and “then hop[ing] it also develops a drug that’s successful.”
"Moderna declined to show important data to investors at a time when it was desperately seeking to keep them onboard, it implies that the company either had something to hide or nothing to show. "
"Per STAT, the delivery system employed by Moderna had consistently “created a daunting challenge: Dose too little, and you don’t get enough enzyme to affect the disease; dose too much, and the drug is too toxic for patients.”
"Whatever the exact cause of the resignation of the head of R & D, it only added to the mystique around Moderna’s inner workings and its ability to deliver on its promise to “revolutionize” medicine. It also reveals more than a few similarities between Moderna and the now-disgraced company Theranos. Theranos, whose former top executive, Elizabeth Holmes, is now on trial for fraud, was known for its extreme culture of secrecy that kept investors and business partners in the dark, forced nondisclosure agreements on everyone who came in contact with the company, and kept employees “siloed” through an extremely strict need-to-know policy. Like Moderna, Theranos had been praised as revolutionary and poised to “change the medical industry forever.” Similarly, its top executive had no professional health-care or science experience, yet both fired or forced the resignations of employees who disagreed with their perspective or were unable to provide “positive” results. Both companies also failed to publish any evidence in peer-reviewed journals that the science behind their multibillion-dollar valued companies was more than just fantasy and a well-devised sales pitch.
"Arguably, the most critical difference between Moderna and Theranos is that Moderna, whose numerous issues and challenges only came to light after the collapse of Theranos had begun, has never faced the same degree of scrutiny from the US government or mainstream investigative journalists. There are many possible reasons for this, including Moderna’s close relationship with the US Department of Defense through the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), or concern that its exposure post-Theranos would bring scrutiny to any company existing at the intersection of Silicon Valley and the health-care industry. However, such a reckoning would likely have been inevitable for Moderna had it not been for the COVID-19 crisis, which could not have come at a more convenient time for the company."
"Such secrecy became commonplace at Moderna after Bancel took the helm, with the company having published no data “supporting its vaunted technology” by the time STAT’s 2016 exposé was published. Insiders as well as investors that had committed millions to the company were only granted “a peek” at the company’s data. According to former Moderna scientists who spoke to STAT, the company was “a case of the emperor’s new clothes.” Former employees further charged that Bancel was actually “running an investment firm” and “then hop[ing] it also develops a drug that’s successful.”
These weekly FLCCC round tables are one of the few things keeping me sane in this world gone mad. Bless all these doctors standing on the right side of history!
I can't stand looking at Fauci's face. Ivermectin suppression is real. Luckily Ivm-Info@pm.me exists as an email information hub detailing the ways in which to obtain it. Just passing it on. Cheers.
I think the whole fluvoxamine geyser across platforms todayis Goliath's attempt to brainwash us all that
Big Pharma is actually on our side---see, look, we are humanitarian, it's repurposed and cheap (and crucially doesn't preclude momoolafirus (whatever Merck's name is)), which means they are actually threatened by the worldwide awareness of their avarice worthy of Dante's 9th circle!
Calling the news persons "journalists" is inaccurate. They are TV personalities - and a very far cry from journalists. :( And check out reports on the VAERs database and non-mainstream media on the deaths and injuries from the vaccines. If you feel you should do it, then do it - you know your body better than I do or any doctor. But don't believe the "safe and effective" bs.
Thank you so much for writing about this horrific situation. We need physicians like those on the FLCCC AND mainstream media professionals, such as yourself, (who've been prohibited from publishing in well respected and recognized newspapers), who will do whatever it takes to write the truth - even if it means starting your own platform , RESCUE. Thank you Michael Capuzzo.
There's a simple reason "well respected and recognized newspapers" won't publish any of this miracle horseshit.... they are "well respected and recognized" indeed. No serious media outlet would ever publish such quackery. You guys only exist in the deepest corner of the internet and you basically preaching mostly to yourselves like a brain-washed cult. Have you actually looked at the FLCCC site recently? It's classic "Infomercial" style misleading propaganda, repeating the same "miracle & evidence" horseshit over and over again. And it's getting worse every week. I guess Kory and his clan of crooks are getting desperate. Serious doctors have long left this criminal enterprise.... what's left is the shameless scum, trying to make a buck of the gullible. What a despicable group of scum bags....
TRUTH? You don't even know the meaning of that word. Otherwise you wouldn't hang out here. The only "horrific situation" here is that scumbags like these "online doctors" are allowed to spread their garbage for profit without ever to worry about getting criminally prosecuted. A silver lining is that these criminals are bound to substack and other unknown sub-standard sites. Thank God!
Please stop getting RESCUE Jim. We don't need your disinformation here. The reality is that ivermectin is recommended in 37 countries around the world which means that 28% of the global population is using ivermectin and preventing hospitalization and death. It's not our job to convince you. Stick with the captured mainstream media and public health agencies but please stay well. No one needs to die from Covid any longer.
Please stop telling me what to read and what to comment on. It's your IVM "Miracle cult" who's spreading misinformation. That's a fact. And your "it's recommended in 37 countries" is just another pile of horse shit. There is not a single reputable medical organization in any of these countries who "recommend" IVM as Covid treatment. Just because some doctors going "rogue" in 37 countries doesn't mean these countries support their quackery. But thank for pointing it out. It's the perfect example for how these FLCCC "online miracle doctors" twisting facts and falsifying data. Thanks again... you just made my day.
Jim - I won't go down this road with you again but I want to give you a chance to investigate on your own. Goggle Uttar Pradesh. Read about the caseload there in May/June- over 400,000 daily infections. ( google covid rates in Uttar Pradesh) Read about the home medicine kits that were distributed to every household in the region with the assistance of the WHO. The kits contained 12 mg. of ivermectin among other items. Goggle what their covid rates are today. It's all there for anyone to see. Their daily cases are less than 50 out of 230 Million people today. They essentially ended the pandemic - also goggle vaccination rates during that spring season - less than 5%. As mentioned, I have nothing else to offer you. Yes, it might be a bit threatening to google what I've suggested.......but give it a try....unless you're too scared to really check this out.
If you don't want to go down that road again... why are you doing it?
I know the Uttar Pradesh story very well... and it proves absolute nothing about efficacy of IVM. But It shows if people follow instructions of their local government health officials, wearing masks, strict isolation, rapid tests etc. that outbreaks can be tamed quickly. Don't even start another round of bullshit that IVM caused a "Uttar Pradesh Miracle"
https://tinyurl.com/3vfz87t9
It is a lie and it's ridiculous... and if you promote this lie you are either dumb, gullible or plain crooked.
Pick your poison. No hard feelings....
You provided a link that supposedly fact checks this claim and deems it false: "The Indian of state Uttar Pradesh has been declared COVID-19 free after the government promoted the use of Ivermectin."
It deems it false by stating this:
"However, the use of ivermectin is extremely controversial, and the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Foods and Drugs Administration (FDA) have advised medical professionals not to prescribe it, adding that the drug could in fact lead to serious illness. Other countries, including the U.S., do not approve of using the anti-parasitic drug for COVID-19 in patients.
Merck, an Ivermectin manufacturer, has stated that preclinical studies show no "scientific basis" for the drug's effectiveness against COVID-19.
Active cases in Uttar Pradesh have declined, but the state is not entirely free of COVID-19. Furthermore, it is incorrect to infer that Ivermectin use played a role in reducing the number of COVID-19 cases in the state, as its use has not been fully approved by public health bodies.
The COVID-19 pandemic has given rise to a lot of potentially dangerous misinformation. For reliable advice on COVID-19, including symptoms, prevention, and available treatment, please refer to the World Health Organization or your national healthcare authority."
This is a joke of a fact check. Any drug, including Aspirin, can lead to serious illness. According to WHO's VigiAccess database, Ivermectin is safer than Aspirin.
Using Merck to fact check? LOL. This knee-slapping funny. Merck is developing a competitor to Ivermectin.
No, Uttar Pradesh is not completely Covid-free, but it's close to zero and only 6% of their population is vaccinated.
Not been fully approved by public health bodies? Which health bodies? How is it not fully approved? Not approved to take 100 mg per day? Even if it not fully approved, so what? It doesn't mean that Ivermectin wasn't a factor in lowering Covid in Uttar Pradesh.
Then this WHO shill, pretending to be a "fact checker", tells us to refer to WHO to get information. This is the WHO that said there is no human-to-human transmission two weeks after Taiwan told them that there is human-to-human transmission. This is the WHO that helped the cigarette industry by dragging its feet on the declaration that nicotine causes cancer. This is the WHO that declared Swine Flu as a pandemic to trigger vaccine sales.
How much is Big Pharma paying you to spread disinformation?
𝑺𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒚: 𝑭𝒍𝒖𝒗𝒐𝒙𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒆 𝒈𝒖𝒂𝒓𝒅𝒔 𝒂𝒈𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒕 𝑪𝑶𝑽𝑰𝑫 𝒉𝒐𝒔𝒑𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒛𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏
A drug that actually works in the fight against Covid:
https://tinyurl.com/yg7sqngm
Still no reason not to get vaccinated 💉
Jim
How many injections will it take to stay protected?
New England Journal Of Medicine
"CONCLUSIONS
"These findings indicate that immunity against the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 waned in all age groups a few months after receipt of the second dose of vaccine."
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2114228?fbclid=IwAR2DOiP4LI_Bwuh4U3t32PcRBNC2AiraJyR-YeQA8olqkBEv5KVYayMmx6E#.YXqxCf2Pkuc.facebook
Exactly. That's why you should go and get a booster..duh. 💉
And getting the boosters can obviously increase potential side effects like this.
"COVID-19 Vaccine Associated Parkinson’s Disease, A Prion Disease Signal in the UK Yellow Card Adverse Event Database”
"Many have argued that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its mRNA sequence, found in all COVID-19 vaccines, are priongenic. The UK’s Yellow Card database of COVID-19 vaccine adverse event reports was evaluated for signals consistent with a pending epidemic of COVID vaccine induced prion disease."
https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-vaccine-associated-parkinsons-disease-a-prion-disease-signal-in-the-uk-yellow-card-adverse-event-database-1746.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0akUJY0VsnPuqRhVbQABc0FMOR1yYNT8Q0we44lWmgNee11cz7RIVoBPI
Yep... you are a nut. Hopeless...
Case closed.
Every three months?
𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑮𝒐𝒐𝒅 𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕 𝑨𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 ‘𝑾𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒏𝒈’ 𝑰𝒎𝒎𝒖𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒚
https://tinyurl.com/yf6pg9gj
Maybe this helps you out...
Jim, FYI
International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
"Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19”
Abstract
"We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies."
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23
You've got to be kidding.... Stephanie Seneff? 😆
https://tinyurl.com/ydfym8r7
Who do you list next... the "MyPillow" guy? 😂
Jeez...are people stupid in this country.
Jim, you seem to have some good resources that don't show up mainstream. Do you have anything showing that natural immunity isn't as good as the vaccine?...thanks.
Well.... Sweden is the perfect example. Their "natural immunity" experiment failed miserably, which has cost them dearly in unnecessary deaths and misery.
https://tinyurl.com/yhtx2n5u
Fortunately, they realized their mistake and changed course.
Vaccination rates are now well above US rate already at 68%
https://tinyurl.com/2k25bw6u
It's okay to admit a mistake and learn from it... it actually shows intelligence.
You're welcome.
Thanks for that but I was more interested in any studies comparing natural vs vaccine antibodies and immunity. Since I'm healthy and have had covid I'm thinking it doesn't make sense for me to get the vaccine, any comparison studies are appreciated.
BTW, I think the anger people have with differing opinions begins/ends with information being interpreted differently. You're giving credit to improved numbers in Sweden due to higher vaccination rates. Singapore has over 80% vaccinated, they wear masks and yet, they currently have their highest case rates ever.
My impression is that a lot of people incorrectly see correlation as causation with a lot of covid data...me, I can only be certain that I'm uncertain I know what's certain...
Well, again.... Sweden had exactly the same idea. They followed your exact train of thought. Become infected and develop your own strong immune response... Done. Apparently, it didn't work that way and they quickly started vaccinating people nationwide... even those who were previously infected.
Look... in the end it comes down to this: Why would you not take the shot? Even if you had Covid before... I took my Moderna Booster last Monday... switched from J&J 7 months ago. If you haven't gotten any shot yet... I'd take the 2 Moderna shots now, hands down. Why? Because you get the most "bang" for your immune system. Pfizer has only half the strength of the Moderna shot. Back in March... I had no choice. They all do their job... but Moderna simply gives you the highest antibody response.
𝑰𝒔 𝑴𝒐𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒂 𝑹𝒆𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝑩𝒆𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝑻𝒉𝒂𝒏 𝑷𝒇𝒊𝒛𝒆𝒓? 𝒀𝒐𝒖 𝒃𝒆𝒕 𝒊𝒕 𝒊𝒔!
https://tinyurl.com/ygb5wrfx
The Singapore example shows that vaccines don't protect you from getting Covid. They never claimed they will 100% ..but they highly protect you from hospitalization and death. That's what the vaccine is -and always was- about. Another fact.. Singapore is were people live literally on top of each other.... basically a paradise for any virus. lol
It might be easier if you compare this to the Flu shot... you might still get the flu... but only mildly with no major complications.
Good luck buddy.
Yeah, Sweden was a favorite target when their numbers were bad. Unfortunately, as I've been trying to tell you, too much data is really only the opinions of people afraid to leave their silo of information. I'm trying to get you outside your silo and even outdoors...I'm sure we agree that Vitamin D helps everyone to fight covid:
https://ianmsc.substack.com/p/why-does-no-one-ever-talk-about-sweden?r=9vncb&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=
British Medical Journal
"Vaccinating people who have had covid-19: why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US?"
"Memoli highlights real world data such as the Cleveland Clinic study18 and points out that while “vaccines are focused on only that tiny portion of immunity that can be induced” by the spike, someone who has had covid-19 was exposed to the whole virus, “which would likely offer a broader based immunity” that would be more protective against variants. The laboratory study offered by the FDA22 “only has to do with very specific antibodies to a very specific region of the virus [the spike],” says Memoli. “Claiming this as data supporting that vaccines are better than natural immunity is shortsighted and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the complexity of immunity to respiratory viruses.”
"Jeffrey Klausner, a clinical professor of preventive medicine at the University of Southern California and former CDC medical officer, who has spoken out in favour of treating prior infection as equivalent to vaccination, with “the same societal status.”3 Klausner conducted a systematic review of 10 studies on reinfection and concluded that the “protective effect” of a previous infection “is high and similar to the protective effect of vaccination.”
"Logistics aside, a recognition of existing immunity would have fundamentally changed the target vaccination calculations and would also affect the calculations on boosters. “As we continued to put effort into vaccination and set targets, it became apparent to me that people were forgetting that herd immunity is formed by both natural immunity and vaccine immunity,” says Klausner."
"Gandhi thinks logistics is only part of the story. “There’s a very clear message out there that ‘OK, well natural infection does cause immunity but it’s still better to get vaccinated,’ and that message is not based on data,” says Gandhi. “There’s something political going on around that.”
“If natural immunity is strongly protective, as the evidence to date suggests it is, then vaccinating people who have had covid-19 would seem to offer nothing or very little to benefit, logically leaving only harms—both the harms we already know about as well as those still unknown,” says Christine Stabell Benn, vaccinologist and professor in global health at the University of Southern Denmark. The CDC has acknowledged the small but serious risks of heart inflammation and blood clots after vaccination, especially in younger people. The real risk in vaccinating people who have had covid-19 “is of doing more harm than good,” she says."
https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2101
Are you trying to impress me with your "Copy/Paste" monologues? 😆
My advise: Go to WalMart and get vaccinated 💉
Nobody reads your stuff anyways...and you would actually do something good for a change.
Your list of "scientists" is just laughable and highly embarrassing.
Good bye!
It wasn't for you Jim.
And your argument is... name calling.
No. My argument is: She's a f**king moron.
https://tinyurl.com/yzr3cpba
And why would anyone with some brain read papers of a lunatic?
Unless you are an idiot yourself. That's why.
Take care now. It's over...
And your evidence is more name calling.
"𝑴𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝑫𝒂𝒕𝒂" 𝑰𝑽𝑴 𝒐𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝑪𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒅
https://tinyurl.com/yhoejly2
Conclusion: Nothing but un-dewormed horseshit.
"It's a Miracle" 😆
Jim,
Who are the fact checkers and who are paying them?
It is your choice to take the vaccine. It is my choice to take IVM when diagnosed.
Are you going to tell this MD that his patients who he treated with IVM didn't get better?
"In Cushing, Oklahoma (pop. 7,826), Dr. Randy Grellner saw Kory’s testimony and started giving his patients Ivermectin, which he’d used safely for years for parasites, for COVID-19 because he was “tired of the heartache...tired of the misery...I’ve seen enough death and despair.” In a few weeks the overwhelmed clinic dropped from twenty-five new COVID-19 cases a day to two. “The first thing that surprised me was how fast was the recovery in seventy- five and eight-five-year-old people,” Dr. Grellner said. “I know there’s controversy. I have no political motivation. I don’t have any desire except to put husbands and wives back together. If you’re getting problems from an organization that you work for that says you can’t use it, I would question that organization. If we’re not doing what is best for the patient, then we need to find another occupation.”
You don't have an argument and your name calling and ad hominem attacks are just that, and nothing more.
I'm gonna post a link of all the "science" NUTS on top of this forum.
Just to help you out honey.... 😘
Jim, In case you missed it.
Moderna the new Theranos?
Moderna has minted three new billionaires including Bancel, "Former employees further charged that Bancel was actually “running an investment firm” and “then hop[ing] it also develops a drug that’s successful.”
"Moderna declined to show important data to investors at a time when it was desperately seeking to keep them onboard, it implies that the company either had something to hide or nothing to show. "
"Per STAT, the delivery system employed by Moderna had consistently “created a daunting challenge: Dose too little, and you don’t get enough enzyme to affect the disease; dose too much, and the drug is too toxic for patients.”
"Whatever the exact cause of the resignation of the head of R & D, it only added to the mystique around Moderna’s inner workings and its ability to deliver on its promise to “revolutionize” medicine. It also reveals more than a few similarities between Moderna and the now-disgraced company Theranos. Theranos, whose former top executive, Elizabeth Holmes, is now on trial for fraud, was known for its extreme culture of secrecy that kept investors and business partners in the dark, forced nondisclosure agreements on everyone who came in contact with the company, and kept employees “siloed” through an extremely strict need-to-know policy. Like Moderna, Theranos had been praised as revolutionary and poised to “change the medical industry forever.” Similarly, its top executive had no professional health-care or science experience, yet both fired or forced the resignations of employees who disagreed with their perspective or were unable to provide “positive” results. Both companies also failed to publish any evidence in peer-reviewed journals that the science behind their multibillion-dollar valued companies was more than just fantasy and a well-devised sales pitch.
"Arguably, the most critical difference between Moderna and Theranos is that Moderna, whose numerous issues and challenges only came to light after the collapse of Theranos had begun, has never faced the same degree of scrutiny from the US government or mainstream investigative journalists. There are many possible reasons for this, including Moderna’s close relationship with the US Department of Defense through the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), or concern that its exposure post-Theranos would bring scrutiny to any company existing at the intersection of Silicon Valley and the health-care industry. However, such a reckoning would likely have been inevitable for Moderna had it not been for the COVID-19 crisis, which could not have come at a more convenient time for the company."
"Such secrecy became commonplace at Moderna after Bancel took the helm, with the company having published no data “supporting its vaunted technology” by the time STAT’s 2016 exposé was published. Insiders as well as investors that had committed millions to the company were only granted “a peek” at the company’s data. According to former Moderna scientists who spoke to STAT, the company was “a case of the emperor’s new clothes.” Former employees further charged that Bancel was actually “running an investment firm” and “then hop[ing] it also develops a drug that’s successful.”
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/10/investigative-reports/moderna-a-company-in-need-of-a-hail-mary/?fbclid=IwAR3sj3z4mzKD5sw7xqIxBVXPZDTNv8GvJXNDpnQL2DjTovNXSSlNig-lXc0
Yep.... just got my Moderna Booster last Monday. 💉
Feeling fantastic.... 👍
These weekly FLCCC round tables are one of the few things keeping me sane in this world gone mad. Bless all these doctors standing on the right side of history!
Wouldn’t miss it! Thanks for all you do!
𝑨𝒏𝒕𝒊-𝒗𝒂𝒄𝒄𝒊𝒏𝒆 𝒑𝒉𝒚𝒔𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒔 𝒘𝒉𝒐 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆 𝒇𝒂𝒍𝒔𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒗𝒂𝒄𝒄𝒊𝒏𝒆𝒔
Here's the list of all the "crazies" and fake "scientists":
https://tinyurl.com/u4625hx5
Welcome to Loonie Town! 😆
I can't stand looking at Fauci's face. Ivermectin suppression is real. Luckily Ivm-Info@pm.me exists as an email information hub detailing the ways in which to obtain it. Just passing it on. Cheers.
I think the whole fluvoxamine geyser across platforms todayis Goliath's attempt to brainwash us all that
Big Pharma is actually on our side---see, look, we are humanitarian, it's repurposed and cheap (and crucially doesn't preclude momoolafirus (whatever Merck's name is)), which means they are actually threatened by the worldwide awareness of their avarice worthy of Dante's 9th circle!
Calling the news persons "journalists" is inaccurate. They are TV personalities - and a very far cry from journalists. :( And check out reports on the VAERs database and non-mainstream media on the deaths and injuries from the vaccines. If you feel you should do it, then do it - you know your body better than I do or any doctor. But don't believe the "safe and effective" bs.
Thank you for your dedication, time and effort to write this article. I bow to you in deep respect.