3 Comments
тна Return to thread

One can support various vaccines, at least for the most vulnerable people, and still support ivermectin use for people who get sick with COVID, whether vaccinated or not.

Expand full comment

One can't support the vaccines when there is a conspiracy to sweep the deaths, heart attacks and strokes caused by them under the rug and make them out to be safe and effective when they are obviously not either. If Fauci were not a depraved crook, he would have made certain that every doctor in every hospital in America was strongly mandated to report to VAERS every suspicious side effect and death, so we could have a complete and accurate record. And then he would have ordered autopsies of any suspicious death. That is how a doctor who was acting responsibly after championing the EUA of a drug using a completely new and untried technology would act. Instead he has suppressed the VAERS data and the two 2021 studies which indicate that VAERS only captures between 3% and 5% of all deaths and injuries.

Expand full comment

Sure one can. One can support Russian Roulette, too!

I prefer a harmless, effective off-label proven intervention with no side effects - even for тАЬthe most vulnerable people.тАЭ Guess what? IVM works for them, too!

There is ZERO Covid in sub-Saharan Africa. Also so happens the entire population takes IVM there as an anti-malarial prophylactic. There is ZERO Covid in Northern IndiaтАЩs Uttar Pradesh state. IVM is universally available and used with benign side-effect, I might add, in both regions.

IVM was first developed as a human intervention. It later was adapted as an animal anti-parasitic its detractors mockingly call тАЬhorse paste.тАЭ

It doesnтАЩt take rocket science to add two plus two and reach four, but it does take an open mind.

Expand full comment