A renowned doctor and journalist call for leaving this false word behind in 2024 to end the censorship that corrupted the nation's covid response and cost countless lives.
I only use the hideous word when some false narrator is attacking me, otherwise, no, the word was popularized in the SPARS pandemic scenario. It was written as part of the plan along with "disinformation."You may peruse it and see for yourself. I had picked up on that immediately. I wish to thank the first woman, who pointed out SPARS scenario. Blonde hair, from New York. She was - is awesome.
I disagree. I think the word "misinformation" should be used at Nuremberg tribunals to describe how criminals and their allies in the antisocial media lied to people. The word should be used to properly prosecute those who participated in the greatest crime ever perpetrated against humanity.
The word is used as a weapon by Fascists, Communists, Marxists and the like to accuse their victims of what they are actually doing.
It's so childish. I remember bullies would start fights when no one was looking and blame his victim for starting it. This tactic puts the victim in the weakest position, on the defensive. It also reminded me of work place disputes I've been involved in where who ever made the complaint to the boss about a coworker was more likely to be believed.
Thanks for the competent analysis, nicely written. It’s surprising that there’s no reference to the origins of the term ‘conspiracy theory’, however. Some have dated it to the CIA’s labelling of claims of their involvement in the assassination of JFK, especially after some parts of the Warren Commission were withheld from publication. Others have suggested the term was used earlier, although generally regarded as a US term [effectively labelling the claim as itself a conspiracy theory, ironically enough.] Maybe we need to distinguish long-term and short-term conspiracy theories somehow? (Examples of the former include the JFK assassination, the 911 event and chemtrail theories; examples of the latter might include the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, Covid ‘vaccines’ and masking). By definition, a theory must be testable (so, e.g., it differs from a belief, such as a belief in god, which relies on faith not just data), and it seems likely that many conspiracy theories are rejected by powerful authorities and their ‘fact-checkers’ and media champions as an alternative to actually testing them properly and as a strategy to silence dissent. [All in the ‘land of the free’.] The observation that sprung up early in the Covid years that the difference between a conspiracy theory and the truth was often measured in time (eg six months), not in quality seems pretty apt.
disappointing this article is tied to kennedy of all people, one of the very class of people pushing the misinfo-disinfo perpetually from their ivory castle protected p.i.g.e. (person in govern-ment employment) positions.
i have been far more interested in what dr shiva has done in america... one of those things is suing kennedy, successfully. i stand by my statement that kennedy is a shill and feel sure the coming new year will expose their fraud to the world, when the swamp does not get drained at all, quite the opposite as 2016 and the rhetoric of doing so showed the world... all paid for actors in a sick b grade thearte.
Well, I can only hope you are wrong about 2025. I don’t think it will be anything like 2016. I think the naïveté of that presidency has been replaced by a more proactive approach. Time will tell.
and stop gaslighting us!
.
They Lied. Join the campaign to Take Action and Raise Public Awareness at
https://TheyLied.ca/
.
I only use the hideous word when some false narrator is attacking me, otherwise, no, the word was popularized in the SPARS pandemic scenario. It was written as part of the plan along with "disinformation."You may peruse it and see for yourself. I had picked up on that immediately. I wish to thank the first woman, who pointed out SPARS scenario. Blonde hair, from New York. She was - is awesome.
Here's the heroine : Diana Leska : https://bitchute.com/video/GDNFTY60ON3U
Look at page 27. It reads "Misinformation: real big: https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf This is the script of what happened.
Amen!!
I disagree. I think the word "misinformation" should be used at Nuremberg tribunals to describe how criminals and their allies in the antisocial media lied to people. The word should be used to properly prosecute those who participated in the greatest crime ever perpetrated against humanity.
The word is used as a weapon by Fascists, Communists, Marxists and the like to accuse their victims of what they are actually doing.
It's so childish. I remember bullies would start fights when no one was looking and blame his victim for starting it. This tactic puts the victim in the weakest position, on the defensive. It also reminded me of work place disputes I've been involved in where who ever made the complaint to the boss about a coworker was more likely to be believed.
Thanks for the competent analysis, nicely written. It’s surprising that there’s no reference to the origins of the term ‘conspiracy theory’, however. Some have dated it to the CIA’s labelling of claims of their involvement in the assassination of JFK, especially after some parts of the Warren Commission were withheld from publication. Others have suggested the term was used earlier, although generally regarded as a US term [effectively labelling the claim as itself a conspiracy theory, ironically enough.] Maybe we need to distinguish long-term and short-term conspiracy theories somehow? (Examples of the former include the JFK assassination, the 911 event and chemtrail theories; examples of the latter might include the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, Covid ‘vaccines’ and masking). By definition, a theory must be testable (so, e.g., it differs from a belief, such as a belief in god, which relies on faith not just data), and it seems likely that many conspiracy theories are rejected by powerful authorities and their ‘fact-checkers’ and media champions as an alternative to actually testing them properly and as a strategy to silence dissent. [All in the ‘land of the free’.] The observation that sprung up early in the Covid years that the difference between a conspiracy theory and the truth was often measured in time (eg six months), not in quality seems pretty apt.
How about we use ex-vaxxer and conspiracy realist?
So many of us never knew just how dangerous all vaccines can be. And just how many conspiracy theories ended up being true (9/11 is just one example)
Fool me once…..
Vocabulary distortion leads to all sorts of dysphorias, such as journalistic and medical dysphoria as witnessed in this article. As I argued before, we need to return to a set of objective standards and definitions, which includes vocabulary: https://www.wildhorsewisdom.xyz/p/whats-in-a-name?r=31a4ti&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true.
'Misinformation' is just one of the misnomers to delete from acceptable vocabulary.
Is the 47% a net rating?
disappointing this article is tied to kennedy of all people, one of the very class of people pushing the misinfo-disinfo perpetually from their ivory castle protected p.i.g.e. (person in govern-ment employment) positions.
Wally, have you read any of his books? Or Turtles All the Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth?
Well written and well documented. Worth reading.
i have been far more interested in what dr shiva has done in america... one of those things is suing kennedy, successfully. i stand by my statement that kennedy is a shill and feel sure the coming new year will expose their fraud to the world, when the swamp does not get drained at all, quite the opposite as 2016 and the rhetoric of doing so showed the world... all paid for actors in a sick b grade thearte.
Well, I can only hope you are wrong about 2025. I don’t think it will be anything like 2016. I think the naïveté of that presidency has been replaced by a more proactive approach. Time will tell.